I’m doing a firsthand comparison between two popular choices in the 92-series pistols: the Taurus PT92 Vs Beretta 92 M9.
As someone who’s spent a considerable amount of time on the range, testing these guns in various conditions, I’m here to share my insights.
My aim is to help you understand the nuances of each model, so you can make an informed decision on which pistol might be the best addition to your collection.
| Feature | Taurus PT92 | Beretta 92 M9 |
| Caliber | 9mm | 9mm |
| Capacity | 17+1 | 17+1 |
| Overall Length | 8.5 inches | 8.5 inches |
| Overall Height | 5.4 inches | 5.4 inches |
| Overall Weight | 34 oz | 33.3 oz |
Overview of Taurus PT92
The Taurus PT92, with its rich history stemming from Beretta’s original designs, stands as a robust and more affordable alternative to its Italian counterpart. It boasts features tailored for practical use and customization.
Specs
- Caliber: 9mm
- Capacity: 17+1
- Overall Length: 8.5 inches
- Overall Height: 5.4 inches
- Overall Weight: 34 oz
- Safety Features: Frame-mounted safety lever with decocker
Overview of Beretta 92 M9
The Beretta 92 M9, a symbol of reliability and performance, has been a staple in military and law enforcement agencies worldwide. Its refined design and superior craftsmanship offer an unmatched shooting experience.
Specs
- Caliber: 9mm
- Capacity: 17+1
- Overall Length: 8.5 inches
- Overall Height: 5.4 inches
- Barrel Length: 4.9 inches
- Weight Unloaded: 33.3 oz
- Safety Features: Slide-mounted safety/decocker
Features Comparison of Taurus PT92 Vs. Beretta 92 M9
1. Safety and Decocking Mechanism
Taurus PT92
The Taurus PT92 showcases a user-friendly frame-mounted safety and decocker mechanism. This thoughtful design makes it significantly easier for the shooter to quickly engage or disengage the safety, especially in situations where stress levels are high.
The placement of these controls on the frame rather than the slide allows for a “cocked and locked” carrying position, providing users with a quick transition to a firing state.
This feature is particularly beneficial for those who value readiness and safety in a defensive scenario, offering a clear operational advantage over its competitor.
Beretta 92 M9
The Beretta 92 M9, on the other hand, incorporates a slide-mounted safety and decocker. This integration streamlines the pistol’s silhouette but introduces certain practical challenges.
Users might find the lever less intuitive to operate, particularly under duress, and those with smaller hands may struggle with its accessibility.
The design also poses a risk of inadvertently engaging the safety while performing slide manipulations, such as during loading or clearing procedures.
Winner
Considering the ease of use and quick accessibility, the Taurus PT92 outshines the Beretta 92 M9 in this category.
Its frame-mounted safety and decocker mechanism provide a distinct ergonomic advantage, reducing the risk of unintended engagement and facilitating a faster, safer draw and ready position.
This makes the Taurus PT92 the preferred choice for those prioritizing efficient safety operation and immediate action readiness.
2. Ergonomics and Grip
Taurus PT92
The Taurus PT92 presents a robust grip that, while slightly bulkier, offers a reassuringly sturdy hold. This heftier grip might not cater to all preferences, particularly for individuals with smaller hands, but it does afford a unique tactile feedback during use.
The added width can enhance control during firing, mitigating recoil and improving shot accuracy for some shooters.
Additionally, the inclusion of a rail for accessory attachment further enhances the PT92’s utility, allowing for customization with lights or lasers, albeit at the cost of increased bulk.
Beretta 92 M9
In contrast, the Beretta 92 M9 features a grip designed with a broader demographic in mind.
Its slimmer profile and subtly curved base fit naturally in the hand, providing an ergonomic advantage that enhances shooting comfort and control, even during extended range sessions.
This design facilitates a more intuitive handling experience, allowing shooters to maintain a firmer, more stable grip. The result is a firearm that feels like an extension of the shooter’s hand, fostering confidence and precision.
Winner
The Beretta 92 M9 emerges as the victor in the domain of ergonomics and grip. Its thoughtful design considerations offer superior comfort and control, making it an ideal choice for a wide array of shooters.
The Beretta’s ability to accommodate diverse hand sizes and its ergonomic advantages provide a significant boost to user experience, positioning it as the more versatile and user-friendly option.
3. Finish and Aesthetics
Taurus PT92
The Taurus PT92’s transition to a matte finish represents a pragmatic choice, prioritizing durability and cost-effectiveness. While this finish may not rival the luster of more premium coatings, it holds its own in terms of practicality, offering decent resistance to wear and tear.
For those looking to personalize their firearm, the PT92’s finish can serve as a blank canvas for customization options such as rebluing, allowing owners to enhance its appearance according to their tastes.
Beretta 92 M9
The Beretta 92 M9 distinguishes itself with its Bruniton finish, which not only exudes a sophisticated aesthetic but also provides a robust barrier against corrosion and environmental damage.
This high-quality finish ensures that the Beretta not only looks impressive out of the box but also maintains its appearance through rigorous use.
The attention to detail in the M9’s finish reflects a blend of beauty and practicality, underscoring Beretta’s commitment to excellence and durability.
Winner
When it comes to finish and aesthetics, the Beretta 92 M9 stands out as the clear leader. Its Bruniton coating offers a perfect combination of visual appeal and functional resilience, enhancing the weapon’s longevity while maintaining its elegant appearance.
This commitment to quality finish positions the Beretta 92 M9 as a top contender for those who value both form and function in their firearm selection.
4. Trigger Mechanism and Feel
Taurus PT92
The Taurus PT92 trigger comes with a bit of a heavy pull and a somewhat grainy feel during the action. It’s not the smoothest experience, and the reset can feel a tad long.
However, this might be less noticeable for shooters accustomed to Taurus pistols, and some may appreciate the definitive feedback it provides, compared to the gun it’s being compared with.
Beretta 92 M9
On the Beretta 92 M9, the trigger mechanism feels lighter and smoother, providing a more refined shooting experience.
The reset is quick and crisp, making follow-up shots faster and more intuitive. This superior trigger feel enhances accuracy and overall performance, especially in scenarios requiring rapid, precise fire.
Winner
The Beretta 92 M9 is the clear winner in terms of trigger mechanism and feel. Its smoother action, lighter pull, and quick reset offer a significant advantage over the Taurus PT92, making it a preferred choice for those prioritizing a refined trigger experience in their shooting practice.
Pros & Cons of Taurus PT92
Pros
- More affordable price point.
- Frame-mounted safety and decocker.
- Comes with a rail for mounting accessories.
Cons
- Heavier and grainier trigger pull.
Pros & Cons of Beretta 92 M9
Pros
- Smoother and lighter trigger pull.
- Superior Bruniton finish for durability and aesthetics.
- Ergonomically better grip design.
Cons
- Higher price point.
Similarities between Taurus PT92 & Beretta 92 M9
- Both chambered in 9mm with a 17+1 capacity.
- Overall length and height are identical.
- Both designs originated from the classic Beretta 92.
- Use of a decocker mechanism in their designs.
Differences between Taurus PT92 & Beretta 92 M9
- Taurus has a frame-mounted safety vs. Beretta’s slide-mounted safety.
- Taurus uses a matte finish; Beretta uses a Bruniton finish.
- Trigger feel on Taurus is heavier and grainier compared to Beretta’s smoother pull.
- Beretta generally has a higher price point compared to Taurus.
Final Verdict
After extensive testing and comparison of the Taurus PT92 and Beretta 92 M9, I’ve reached a conclusion.
Both pistols exhibit remarkable qualities, but one has edged out as a more fitting choice for my preferences and shooting style.
The Beretta 92 M9 emerged as the winner in most comparisons, primarily due to its superior ergonomics, smoother trigger mechanism, and the durability of its finish.
FAQs
Is Taurus PT92 better than Beretta 92?
The Beretta 92 offers better ergonomics and a smoother trigger, making it a preferred choice for many shooters.
Is Beretta M9 better than 92FS?
Choice between M9 and BERETTA 92FS depends on preference for tactical use (M9) or advanced ergonomics and sights (92FS).
Is the Beretta 92FS better than Glock?
Glock 17 may win in capacity and weight, but choice between 92FS and Glock 17 depends on individual preference for features and design.
Is Taurus a quality pistol?
Taurus is recognized for offering great value and has focused on manufacturing the best possible gun, as seen with the GX4.
