Today, I’m diving into a detailed comparison between two renowned guns: the Springfield SA-35 Vs Hi Power MK3.
Both models boast a legacy of craftsmanship and performance, but which one truly stands out in the field? My aim in this article is to give you an insider’s view, based on rigorous testing and hands-on experience, to help you understand which of these firearms might be the winner for your specific needs.
| Specification | Springfield SA-35 | Hi Power MK3 |
| Caliber | 9mm | 9mm |
| Capacity | 15+1 rounds | 13 rounds |
| Barrel Length | 4.6 inches | 4.625 inches |
| Weight (Empty) | 32 ounces | 32 ounces |
| Trigger Pull | 5.25 pounds | Approx. 7.5 pounds |
| Trigger Action | Single Action | Single Action |
Springfield SA-35
The Springfield SA-35 is a contemporary homage to the classic Browning Hi-Power design. It’s a blend of traditional aesthetics with modern functionality.
Specifications
- Caliber: 9mm
- Capacity: 15+1 rounds
- Barrel Length: 4.6 inches
- Overall Weight: 32 ounces
- Trigger Pull: 5.25 pounds (as tested)
- Sights: White dot front, drift-adjustable rear
- Frame: Steel
- Safety: Thumb safety, located as in the original Browning
- Grip: Traditional high-power, wood checker grips
- Slide: Matte blued
- Trigger: Single action, operable without magazine insertion
Browning Hi-Power MK3 9mm
The Hi-Power MK3 continues the legacy of John Browning’s last design, offering a blend of history and performance.
Specifications
- Caliber: 9mm
- Capacity: 13 rounds
- Barrel Length: 4.625 inches
- Overall Length: 7.75 inches
- Height: 5.02 inches
- Width: 1.4 inches
- Sight Radius: 6.3125 inches
- Weight (Empty): 32 ounces
- Trigger Action: Single Action
- Trigger Pull: Approximately 7.5 pounds
Features Comaprison: Springfield SA-35 vs Hi-Power MK3
1. Trigger Mechanics
Springfield SA-35
The Springfield SA-35’s trigger mechanism stands out with its lighter pull of approximately 5.25 pounds. This feature significantly improved shot smoothness and rapid shot succession in my field tests.
The trigger’s near-full position reset and negligible over-travel contribute to a remarkably crisp and responsive shooting experience. This lighter trigger substantially aids in minimizing shooter fatigue, allowing for prolonged sessions without compromising accuracy or control.
Hi-Power MK3
The Hi-Power MK3, in contrast, features a heavier trigger pull, weighing around 7.5 pounds. This heavier pull demands a more deliberate and controlled shooting approach.
Some shooters might find this weight appealing, as it harks back to a more traditional shooting experience. However, during my rapid firing tests, I observed a slight but noticeable impact on shot placement accuracy.
The heavier trigger seems to introduce a small delay in firing sequences, which could be critical in scenarios demanding quick response.
Winner
When comparing the two, the Springfield SA-35 undoubtedly takes the lead in trigger mechanics. The lighter, more responsive trigger significantly enhances overall shooting performance, particularly in scenarios where rapid and repetitive firing is essential.
The SA-35’s trigger aids in achieving a higher level of precision and ease, making it more suitable for both competitive shooting and casual range days. In contrast, the MK3’s heavier trigger, while offering a classic feel, falls short of facilitating quick, accurate shots.
2. Sights and Accuracy
Springfield SA-35
The sighting system of the SA-35 is another area where it shines. It is equipped with a white dot front sight paired with a black serrated rear sight. This combination provided me with outstanding visibility and precise targeting at various ranges.
The contrast between the white dot and the black serrated background allowed for quick and effortless target acquisition. Furthermore, the sight’s design performed admirably in different lighting conditions, offering consistent accuracy whether in bright daylight or in dimmer indoor ranges.
Hi-Power MK3
The Hi-Power MK3 opts for a more traditional sight setup, with a front square and rear lines. While these sights are undoubtedly functional and reliable, I found them a bit more challenging to work with compared to the SA-35.
The target acquisition, particularly in rapid transition drills, was slower. Additionally, in low-light conditions, the sight contrast was not as pronounced as the SA-35’s, resulting in a slight delay in achieving optimal sight alignment and picture.
Winner
In the realm of sights and accuracy, the Springfield SA-35 outperforms the Hi-Power MK3. Its sight design facilitates faster and more intuitive target acquisition, an essential factor in both competitive and recreational shooting.
The high-contrast sights of the SA-35 significantly aid in maintaining consistency across various lighting scenarios, ensuring a shooter can rely on their sight picture regardless of external conditions. The MK3, while reliable, does not offer the same level of quick, intuitive sighting as the SA-35.
3. Ergonomics and Handling
Springfield SA-35
The ergonomic design of the SA-35 is meticulously crafted, featuring traditional high-power wood checker grips. These grips not only enhance the firearm’s aesthetic appeal but also offer an excellent grip, reducing slippage and improving control.
The wider thumb safety is strategically placed for easy reach and operation, making it more user-friendly, especially in high-pressure situations. The comfort and control provided by these ergonomic features significantly contribute to a more enjoyable and effective shooting experience.
Hi-Power MK3
The Hi-Power MK3’s ergonomics are designed with a focus on practicality and versatility. It sports polymer grips, which, while lacking the classic charm of wood, offer a sturdy and secure hold.
The ambidextrous thumb safety is a thoughtful addition, catering to both right and left-handed shooters. However, these features, while functional, don’t deliver the same level of comfort and traditional shooting feel as the SA-35’s ergonomics.
The polymer grips, in particular, might feel less natural to shooters accustomed to traditional materials.
Winner
In terms of ergonomics and handling, the Springfield SA-35 stands superior to the Hi-Power MK3. Its wood checker grips provide not just a visually pleasing aspect but also a significantly better grip and overall handling experience.
The widened thumb safety enhances usability under various shooting conditions, making the SA-35 more adaptable and comfortable to use.
While the MK3’s ambidextrous feature and polymer grips are commendable, they do not quite match the superior ergonomic design and user experience provided by the SA-35.
Pros & Cons: Springfield SA-35
Pros
- Lighter trigger pull for smoother shooting.
- Traditional wood checker grips for better handling.
- Wider thumb safety for ease of use.
Cons
- Slightly heavier than the Hi-Power MK3.
Pros & Cons: Hi Power MK3
Pros
- Ambidextrous safety is suitable for all shooters.
- Durable polymer grips.
- Heavier trigger pull is preferred by some shooters.
Cons
- Heavier trigger can affect rapid fire accuracy.
Similarities Between Springfield SA-35 & Hi Power MK3
- Both are 9mm caliber firearms.
- Similar barrel lengths (SA-35 at 4.6 inches, MK3 at 4 5/8 inches).
- Single-action trigger mechanism.
- Steel frame construction.
- Designed with inspiration from the original Browning high power.
Differences Between Springfield SA-35 & Hi Power MK3
- SA-35 has a lighter trigger pull (5.25 lbs) compared to MK3 (approx. 7.5 lbs).
- SA-35 features wood checker grips, MK3 has polymer grips.
- SA-35’s thumb safety is wider but not ambidextrous, while MK3’s is ambidextrous.
- Slight weight difference (SA-35 is 32 oz, MK3 is 2 lbs).
- SA-35 has white dot front and drift-adjustable rear sights; MK3 has a front square and lined rear sights.
Final Verdict
After meticulously testing and comparing the Springfield SA-35 and the Hi-Power MK3, it is evident that both firearms exhibit remarkable qualities, each embodying a unique blend of history, craftsmanship, and performance.
However, in most of the comparisons, the Springfield SA-35 emerged as the clear winner for me. Its superior trigger mechanics, enhanced sight accuracy, and exceptional ergonomics make it a more adaptable, precise, and comfortable firearm for a range of shooting scenarios.
Its blend of classic design with modern enhancements truly sets it apart, offering the best of both worlds. Therefore, the Springfield SA-35 is my preferred choice, excelling in functionality while honoring the legacy of the original Browning Hi-Power.
FAQs
What’s so special about Browning Hi Power?
The Browning Hi-Power is renowned for its single-action design and the significant enhancement in 1962, which introduced an external extractor for improved reliability.
What gun is similar to Browning Hi Power?
A similar gun to the Browning Hi Power is the EAA Girsan MC P35, a faithful Turkish-made reproduction featuring an ambidextrous safety and retaining the magazine safety characteristic of the Mk III Hi-Power.
What is the difference between MC P35 and SA35?
The primary differences between the MC P35 and the SA-35 lie in their surface controls, hammers, and grips. The SA-35 features more extended manual safety and slide-stop levers, while the MCP35 has a more basic slide-stop lever and an ambidextrous safety lever.
Is the Hi-Power better than the 1911?
The preference between the Hi-Power and the 1911 varies. While the Hi-Power offers a higher ammo capacity, the 1911 is known for its superior trigger and greater customization options.
