I’ve had the chance to test two popular guns in the field: The Sig P320 Vs CZ 75.
As a professional shooter, It’s always exciting to compare different firearms, and this time, it’s a head-to-head between these two well-known models.
Let’s dive in and see how they stack up against each other!
| Specification | SIG P320 | CZ 75 |
| Caliber | 9mm | 9mm Luger |
| Action Type | Striker Fired DAO | DA/SA (Double Action/Single Action) |
| Trigger Pull DA | 5.5 – 7.5 lbs | D11 lbs. 0.7 oz. |
| Overall Length | 7.2 inches | 7.24 inches |
| Overall Height | 5.3 inches | 5.03 inches |
| Overall Width | 1.4 inches | 1.38 inches |
| Barrel Length | 3.9 inches | 3.75 inches |
| Weight with Magazine | 26.0 oz | Unloaded: 33.28 oz, Loaded: 44.8 oz |
| Magazine Capacity | 15 Rounds | 14 Rounds |
| Sights | SIGLITE Night Sights | Fixed, Three-Dot, Luminescent |
Overview of Sig P320
The SIG P320, known for its versatility and reliability, has become a top choice for law enforcement and civilian shooters.
Specs
- Caliber: 9mm
- Action Type: Striker Fired DAO (Double Action Only)
- Trigger Pull D5.5 – 7.5 lbs
- Overall Length: 7.2 inches
- Overall Height: 5.3 inches
- Overall Width: 1.4 inches
- Barrel Length: 3.9 inches
- Sight Radius: 5.8 inches
- Weight with Magazine: 26.0 oz
- Magazine Capacity: 15 Rounds
- Sights: SIGLITE Night Sights
- Grips: Interchangeable Polymer
- Frame Finish: Black Polymer
- Slide Finish: Nitron
Overview of CZ 75
The CZ 75 Compact, tailored for concealed carry, combines a smaller frame with the classic features of the standard CZ 75.
Specs
- Caliber: 9mm Luger
- Firearm Type: Handgun
- Purpose: Concealed Carry
- Magazine Capacity: 14 Rounds, bumper pads
- Frame Material: Steel
- Grips: Plastic
- Trigger Mechanism: DA/SA (Double Action/Single Action)
- Trigger Pull (Single Action): 5 lbs. 4.3 oz.
- Trigger Pull (Double Action): 11 lbs. 0.7 oz.
- Sights: Fixed, three-dot, luminescent
- Barrel Type: Cold Hammer Forged
- Barrel Length: 3.75 inches
- Weight Unloaded w/Magazine: 33.28 oz
- Weight Loaded: 44.8 oz (with 14+1 rounds, 147-grain JHP)
- Overall Length: 7.24 inches
- Height: 5.03 inches
- Width: 1.38 inches
Features Comparison: SIG P320 Vs CZ 75
1. Ergonomics and Comfort
SIG P320
The ergonomics of the SIG P320 are impressive. Its grip is designed to accommodate various hand sizes, thanks to the interchangeable polymer grips.
This adaptability ensures a comfortable and secure hold, which is crucial during extended shooting sessions. Additionally, the overall design of the P320, including its weight distribution and the smoothness of its slide, makes it easy to handle, even for shooters with less grip strength.
This is particularly beneficial for individuals like myself, who have weaker hands or issues like arthritis.
CZ 75
On the other hand, the CZ 75 Compact, with its steel frame and plastic grips, offers a distinctly different ergonomic experience. The grip is solid and provides a reliable hold, but it may not be as accommodating for shooters with smaller hands or those who require more grip customization.
The lower bore axis of the CZ 75 does make it shoot smoothly, but racking the slide can be a challenge for some, especially for older shooters or those with hand issues, as mentioned in the user’s personal experience.
Winner
In terms of ergonomics and comfort, the SIG P320 takes the lead compared to the CZ 75. Its customizable grip options and easier slide operation make it a more user-friendly choice for a broader range of shooters, especially those with hand strength considerations.
2. Trigger Mechanism and Pull
SIG P320
The trigger mechanism of the SIG P320, being a Striker Fired DAO (Double Action Only), offers a consistent and smooth pull, which is crucial for accuracy.
The trigger pull weight ranges from 5.5 to 7.5 lbs, providing a balanced feel that is neither too light nor too heavy. This consistency in trigger pull is a significant advantage during rapid fire or stressful shooting scenarios, where predictability in trigger behavior is key.
CZ 75
The CZ 75, with its DA/SA (Double Action/Single Action) trigger mechanism, offers a different shooting experience. The double-action pull is heavier at 11 lbs. 0.7 oz., which can be challenging for quick, accurate shots, especially for those not used to a heavier pull.
The single-action pull, however, is lighter and more crisp at 5 lbs. 4.3 oz., which is excellent for precision shooting. This variability in trigger pull between modes can be both an advantage and a challenge, depending on the shooter’s preference and experience.
Winner
When comparing trigger mechanisms and pull, the SIG P320 edges out the CZ 75. Its consistent trigger pull in a striker-fired setup is generally more user-friendly and predictable compared to the dual nature of the CZ’s DA/SA mechanism.
3. Sights and Accuracy
SIG P320
The SIG P320 comes equipped with SIGLITE Night Sights, which are highly effective in low-light conditions. These sights are easy to align and provide a clear sight picture, contributing to better accuracy.
The sight radius of 5.8 inches also aids in achieving more precise shots, making it a reliable choice for both target shooting and defensive situations.
CZ 75
The CZ 75 features fixed, three-dot, luminescent sights. These sights are adequate for quick target acquisition and are effective in various lighting conditions.
However, they might not offer the same level of precision as the SIGLITE Night Sights, especially in darker environments. The slightly shorter barrel length of the CZ 75 might also impact the sight radius, affecting long-range accuracy to a small extent.
Winner
In the sights and accuracy category, the SIG P320 is the winner compared to the CZ 75. Its night sights and longer sight radius provide a slight edge in terms of accuracy and versatility in different lighting conditions.
Pros & Cons: SIG P320
Pros
- Ergonomic design with interchangeable grips suits various hand sizes.
- Striker Fired DAO provides a consistent trigger pull.
- SIGLITE Night Sights enhance visibility in low-light conditions.
- Easier slide operation, beneficial for shooters with weaker hands.
- Polymer frame offers a lightweight yet durable build.
Cons
- Polymer frame might not provide the same classic feel as a metal frame.
Pros & Cons: CZ 75
Pros
- DA/SA trigger mechanism offers versatility between a heavy and light pull.
- Steel frame construction feels robust and durable.
- Lower bore axis contributes to smooth shooting and reduced recoil.
- Luminescent sights are effective in various lighting conditions.
- Compact size ideal for concealed carry.
Cons
- The slide might be difficult to rack for individuals with weaker hands.
Similarities Between Sig P320 & CZ 75
- Both firearms are chambered in 9mm.
- Designed for practical use and reliability.
- Each model features unique night sights for improved visibility.
- Both have a reputation for accuracy and durability.
- Similar in overall length and height dimensions.
Differences Between SIG P320 & CZ 75
- SIG P320 has a striker-fired action, while CZ 75 uses a DA/SA mechanism.
- P320 offers interchangeable polymer grips; CZ 75 has fixed plastic grips.
- SIG P320 utilizes a polymer frame; CZ 75 has a steel frame.
- P320’s slide is easier to operate compared to CZ 75’s.
- CZ 75’s lower bore axis affects recoil management differently than P320.
- SIG P320’s night sights are SIGLITE, whereas CZ 75 has fixed luminescent sights.
- CZ 75’s design is more tailored towards concealed carry.
- Trigger pull dynamics differ significantly between the two models.
- The weight of the CZ 75 is generally heavier due to its steel construction.
Final Verdict
After thoroughly testing and comparing the SIG P320 and the CZ 75, it’s time to conclude which gun takes the crown. It’s been an intriguing journey, exploring each firearm’s strengths and weaknesses. While both guns have their merits, my choice is the SIG P320.
This decision is based on its superior ergonomics, consistent trigger pull, and better sight system, which make it a more versatile and user-friendly option for a wide range of shooters
.
FAQ’s
Why is the CZ 75 so good?
The CZ 75 is renowned for its comfortable grip, fitting most hand sizes well, and its use of standard 9mm ammunition. Its design has stood the test of time with minimal alterations, maintaining its reputation for comfort and reliability in shooting.
Is Sig P320 better than Glock?
The SIG P320 and Glock both have their own advantages and disadvantages. The choice between them ultimately comes down to personal preference, with each offering distinct features that appeal to different shooters.
What is the SIG P320 equivalent to?
The SIG P320 is often compared to the Glock 19. Both have similar barrel lengths and sight radii with striker-fired triggers. The P320C tends to have a slightly more refined trigger than the Glock 19, though the differences are minimal.
What military uses the CZ 75?
The CZ 75 was adopted by the Czech armed forces after the Velvet Revolution in 1989. It’s also popular among sport shooters in the Czech Republic.
Is a CZ 75 better than a Glock?
The CZ 75 is often considered to shoot better than a Glock, offering a smoother experience. However, the Glock 19 can perform comparably well, though it might feel like more effort is needed to achieve the same proficiency.
