I will dive into a head-to-head comparison of two standout firearms: the Glock 22 Vs SIG P320.
As a professional shooter, I’ve had the chance to take both these guns out in the field, testing them in various scenarios. My aim? To figure out which one edges out the other.
We’re talking about two highly respected guns in the shooter community, each with its unique strengths and characteristics.
So, buckle up as we explore what sets these two apart and, more importantly, which one could be crowned the winner in this showdown.
| Feature | Glock 22 | SIG P320 |
| Caliber | .40 S&W | 9mm Luger |
| Magazine Capacity | 15 rounds | 17+1 rounds |
| Barrel Length | 4.49 inches | 4.7 inches |
| Weight | 25.57 oz (with empty magazine) | 1 lb., 13.6 oz. |
| Overall Length | 8.03 inches | 8 inches |
| Overall Width | 1.26 inches | 1.3 inches |
Overview of Glock 22
The Glock 22 is a powerhouse in the world of firearms, renowned for its reliability and performance.
Designed to handle the robust .40 S&W cartridge, it’s a top pick for law enforcement and shooting aficionados alike.
Specs
- Caliber: .40 S&W
- Magazine Capacity: Standard: 15 rounds
- Barrel Length: 4.49 inches
- Weight: 25.57 oz (with empty magazine)
- Trigger Pull: 28 N
- Overall Length: 8.03 inches
- Slide Length: 7.32 inches
- Overall Width: 1.26 inches
- Slide Width: 1.0 inch
Overview of SIG P320
The SIG P320, a striker-fired semi automatic, is a versatile and modern firearm. Its adaptability and 9mm Luger cartridge make it a favorite among many shooters, both for personal defense and competitive shooting.
Specs
- Caliber: 9mm Luger
- Capacity: 17+1 rounds
- Barrel Length: 4.7 inches
- Overall Length: 8 inches
- Weight: 1 lb., 13.6 oz.
- Height: 5.5 inches
- Width: 1.3 inches
- Trigger: 8 lbs
Top 4 Features: Glock 22 VS SIG P320
1. Durability and Maintenance
Glock 22
The Glock 22 is renowned for its ruggedness. Its polymer frame and Tenifer-treated steel parts make it highly resistant to wear and tear.
In my testing, this gun has proven to withstand various environmental conditions, from extreme cold to dusty terrains. The Glock’s simplicity also shines in maintenance.
This ease of maintenance ensures that the gun remains reliable over time, a critical factor for any serious shooter.
SIG P320
The SIG P320, on the other hand, boasts a modular design that is not only innovative but also contributes to its durability.
The ability to easily swap out frames and grips means that wear and tear can be managed more effectively. During my time with the P320, it has shown resilience against the typical wear from regular shooting.
However, maintenance is a bit more involved compared to the Glock 22. While it’s not overly complicated, the P320 requires a bit more attention and care, especially when dealing with its modular components.
Winner
In the durability and maintenance showdown, the Glock 22 takes the crown. Its legendary toughness and ease of maintenance make it an ideal choice for those who need a reliable firearm that can withstand heavy use without demanding too much in terms of upkeep.
While the SIG P320 is a robust contender, the Glock 22’s straightforward design and proven track record give it the upper hand in this category.
2. Magazine Capacity and Reloading
Glock 22
The Glock 22 comes with a standard magazine capacity of 15 rounds, which is quite generous for a handgun chambered in .40 S&W. In my field tests, I found the reloading process smooth and efficient.
The magazine springs are sturdy, ensuring a reliable feed of rounds. This capacity is a sweet spot for tactical situations and self-defense, offering a good number of rounds without making the gun too bulky.
SIG P320
The SIG P320, chambered in 9mm Luger, steps it up with a 17+1 round capacity. During testing, I appreciated the extra rounds, especially in competitive shooting scenarios.
The P320’s magazine design also facilitates quick and easy reloads, a critical factor in high-pressure situations. Its smooth magazine ejection and insertion are noteworthy.
Winner
While both guns perform admirably, the SIG P320 takes the lead in this category.
The higher capacity and fluid reloading experience give it an edge, particularly in scenarios where those extra rounds could make a significant difference.
3. Accuracy and Handling
Glock 22
The Glock 22, with its 4.49-inch barrel, provides commendable accuracy. Its ergonomic design and balanced weight distribution contribute to steady handling and reduced muzzle flip, especially notable when firing multiple rounds quickly.
In field tests, the Glock 22 demonstrated consistent accuracy at various distances, making it a reliable choice for both professional and personal use.
SIG P320
The SIG P320, sporting a slightly longer barrel at 4.7 inches, impresses with its precision. Its striker-fired mechanism offers a smooth and consistent trigger pull, which I found enhances accuracy.
The grip and overall ergonomics of the P320 are designed for comfort and control, allowing for accurate shot placement even under stress.
Winner
It’s a close call, but I’m declaring a tie in this category. The Glock 22’s stability and the SIG P320’s smooth trigger pull both contribute significantly to their accuracy.
Each gun has its strengths, making them both excellent choices for accurate shooting.
3. Ergonomics and Comfort
Glock 22
The Glock 22’s ergonomics are well-thought-out, with a comfortable grip and a balanced feel in the hand. Its overall width of 1.26 inches makes it a good fit for various hand sizes.
During extended shooting sessions, I found the Glock 22 remained comfortable to hold and operate, with its controls easily accessible.
SIG P320
The SIG P320 shines in ergonomics. Its modular design allows for a customizable grip, making it a versatile choice for shooters with different hand sizes.
The slightly wider width of 1.3 inches and the higher height provide a solid and comfortable grip. During testing, I found the P320’s ergonomics contributed to better control and less fatigue.
Winner
The SIG P320 edges out the Glock 22 in this category. Its modular design and customizable grip options cater to a broader range of shooters, offering superior comfort and control. For those who value a personalized feel in their handgun, the P320 is the clear winner.
Pros & Cons of Glock 22
Pros
- Reliable Performance: Consistently performs well in various conditions.
- Ease of Maintenance: Simple design makes cleaning and upkeep straightforward.
- Durable Construction: Polymer frame and treated steel resist wear and tear.
- Good Magazine Capacity: 15-round standard magazine is ample for most needs.
- Balanced Handling: Well-designed ergonomics for comfortable use.
Cons
- Trigger Feel: Some shooters may find the 28 N trigger pull less smooth.
Pros & Cons of SIG P320
Pros
- Modular Design: Allows for customization and easy part replacement.
- Higher Capacity: Comes with a 17+1 round magazine.
- Ergonomic Grip: Comfortable for various hand sizes and extended use.
- Modern Aesthetics: Has a sleek and contemporary appearance.
- Versatile Caliber: 9mm Luger is a popular and widely available choice.
Cons
- More Complex Maintenance: Requires more attention compared to simpler designs.
- Slightly Larger Dimensions: May be bulkier for some users, especially in concealed carry.
Similarities between Glock 22 & SIG P320
- Semi-Automatic: Both are semi-automatic handguns.
- Law Enforcement Use: Widely used by law enforcement agencies.
- Polymer Frame: Feature durable polymer frames.
- Accessory Rail: Equipped with rails for mounting accessories.
- Striker-Fired: Both use a striker-fired mechanism.
- Reputation for Reliability: Known for their reliability and durability.
Differences between Glock 22 & SIG P320
- Caliber: Glock 22 is .40 S&W, SIG P320 is 9mm Luger.
- Magazine Capacity: Glock 22 holds 15 rounds, SIG P320 holds 17+1 rounds.
- Barrel Length: Glock 22 has a 4.49-inch barrel, SIG P320 has a 4.7-inch barrel.
- Trigger Pull: Glock 22’s trigger is 28 N, SIG P320’s is 8 lbs.
- Design Flexibility: SIG P320 has a modular design, Glock 22 does not.
- Overall Width: Glock 22 is 1.26 inches wide, SIG P320 is 1.3 inches wide.
- Weight: Glock 22 is lighter compared to the SIG P320.
- Maintenance: Glock 22 is simpler to maintain than the SIG P320.
- Aesthetics: SIG P320 has a more modern look than the Glock 22.
- Ergonomics: SIG P320 offers more customization in grip and feel.
- Slide Width: Glock 22 has a narrower slide at 1.0 inch.
Final Verdict
After thorough testing and comparison, it’s time to wrap up this head-to-head between the Glock 22 and the SIG P320. Both firearms have proven themselves to be top contenders in their class, each shining in different aspects.
My personal choice, after considering all factors, leans towards the SIG P320. The deciding factors for me were its higher magazine capacity, customizable ergonomics, and modern design. These attributes align well with my shooting style and needs, particularly in scenarios where adaptability and extra rounds are beneficial.
FAQ’s
Is Sig P320 better than Glock?
Both the Sig P320 and Glock are excellent firearms with high accuracy and desirable features. The choice between them boils down to personal comfort and preference, as each has unique advantages.
Why is the Glock 22 so popular?
The Glock 22 is immensely popular, especially among U.S. law enforcement, due to its potent .40 S&W caliber, high capacity relative to size and weight, and renowned reliability.
Why did the army choose P320?
The army chose the P320 for its unprecedented modularity, allowing interchangeable grip modules and caliber conversions. It also supports silencers and comes with various magazine capacities, making it versatile for military use.
Is Glock or SIG more reliable?
In terms of reliability, Glock and SIG pistols are on par. Both brands offer high-quality construction and consistent performance, with stoppages usually attributed to shooter error rather than mechanical failure.
