I’m a professional shooter with a knack for testing out some of the best firearms. In this article, I’m taking you along for an exciting comparison between two remarkable guns: the Springfield Springfield SA-35 Vs FN High Power.
My goal? To sift through their features, test them in the field, and determine which one takes the crown. Trust me, this isn’t just about listing specs; it’s about real, hands-on experience.
| Feature | Springfield SA-35 | FN High Power |
| Caliber | 9mm | 9mm |
| Capacity | 15+1 rounds | 17+1 rounds |
| Barrel Length | 4.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| Weight | 32 oz. | 2 lbs., 8 oz. |
| Trigger Pull | 5.25 lbs. (tested) | 5.10 lbs. |
| Sights | White dot front, drift-adjustable rear | Fixed front post, rear v-notch |
| Action Type | Single-action | Single-action |
Overview of Springfield SA-35
The Springfield SA-35 isn’t just another firearm; it’s a blend of classic design and modern mechanics.
Specs
- Caliber: 9mm
- Capacity: 15+1 rounds
- Barrel Length: 4.6 inches
- Weight: 32 oz.
- Trigger Pull: 5.25 lbs. (tested)
- Sights: White dot front, drift-adjustable rear
Overview of FN High Power
The FN High Power, a timeless classic, has earned its reputation on the battlefield and in the hands of enthusiasts.
Specs
- Caliber: 9mm
- Capacity: 17+1 rounds
- Barrel Length: 4.7 inches
- Overall Length: 8 inches
- Width: 1.35 inches
- Height: 5.62 inches
- Weight: 2 lbs., 8 oz.
Features Comparison of Springfield SA-35 VS FN High Power
1. Barrel Length and Quality
Springfield SA-35
The Springfield SA-35 sports a 4.6-inch barrel, a dimension thoughtfully chosen to balance accuracy with ease of handling.
During my field tests, I found the SA-35’s barrel impressively reliable. Its shots were consistent, and the accuracy was commendable at various ranges. The barrel’s build quality speaks volumes of modern firearm manufacturing, ensuring a smooth and enjoyable shooting experience.
Its sleek construction enhances its look and contributes to its performance, making it a reliable choice for both casual and serious shooters.
FN High Power
In contrast, the FN High Power features a slightly longer barrel at 4.7 inches. This extra length was evident in the field, providing a noticeable boost in accuracy, especially at longer distances.
The barrel’s craftsmanship is a testament to FN’s historic dedication to quality. It feels robust and well-made, a blend of traditional gunsmithing excellence and contemporary manufacturing.
The High Power’s barrel has a certain historical charm that appeals to enthusiasts, but more importantly, it performs exceptionally well, giving it a revered status among handguns.
Winner
When comparing the two, the FN High Power edges out the Springfield SA-35 regarding barrel quality. Its slightly longer length gives it a tangible advantage in long-range accuracy, making it a preferred choice for precision-focused shooting.
The High Power’s barrel performs well and carries a sense of history and tradition in its design, appealing to both collectors and shooting aficionados.
2. Trigger Mechanism
Springfield SA-35
The trigger of the Springfield SA-35, with a pull weight of about 5.25 lbs, stands out for its light and responsive feel. This lighter pull proved advantageous in practical use, allowing for swift and repeated shots without much effort.
The trigger mechanism is designed to be smooth, with minimal overtravel, enhancing the overall shooting experience. This makes it comfortable for extended periods at the range, and its responsiveness is particularly beneficial in scenarios where quick reaction times are essential.
The SA-35’s trigger is a notable example of how modern enhancements can improve the functionality and user experience of a firearm.
FN High Power
The FN High Power’s trigger, on the other hand, offers a slightly heavier pull at 5.10 lbs. This weight, coupled with the shallow curve of the trigger, provides a controlled shooting experience.
The heavier pull adds a layer of intentionality to each shot, making it less likely to fire prematurely. The short travel and crisp reset of the trigger are conducive to improved accuracy and control, especially in precise shooting scenarios.
It feels robust and reliable, a characteristic that many traditional shooters might prefer, especially those accustomed to classic firearms.
Winner
In this comparison, the Springfield SA-35’s trigger mechanism comes out on top. Its lighter pull weight makes it easier to use, particularly for rapid firing sequences, without compromising on control or accuracy.
This aspect, along with modern refinements, makes the SA-35’s trigger slightly more appealing for a wide range of shooting activities, from casual target practice to more serious competitive shooting.
3. Sights
Springfield SA-35
The Springfield SA-35 is equipped with a white dot front sight and a drift-adjustable rear sight, a combination that I found highly effective in various lighting conditions and shooting environments.
During my testing, these sights facilitated quick and easy target acquisition. The adjustability of the rear sight is a significant advantage, allowing shooters to fine-tune their aim based on distance and lighting conditions.
This feature is especially useful for those who shoot in diverse environments or under different light settings. The modern design of these sights contributes to the firearm’s overall appeal, making it a versatile choice for both novice and experienced shooters.
FN High Power
The FN High Power sports a more traditional sighting system with a fixed front post and a rear v-notch. These sights are less adaptable compared to the SA-35’s, but they offer a solid, dependable aiming solution.
The design reflects the High Power’s military heritage and has proven effective over many years.
Although less flexible in terms of adjustability, these sights are reliable and offer a straightforward, no-frills approach to aiming, which can be particularly appealing to purists or those who prefer a more traditional shooting experience.
Winner
The Springfield SA-35 triumphs in this category with its more adaptable sighting system. The combination of a white dot front and adjustable rear sight provides greater versatility and ease of use across various conditions and distances.
This adaptability gives the SA-35 a distinct advantage for a broader range of shooting applications, making it a more suitable option for shooters who value flexibility and ease of use in their sighting system.
4. Ergonomics and Handling
Springfield SA-35
The SA-35 feels remarkably comfortable in hand. Its grip contour and balance make it a pleasure to hold and shoot. In field tests, the ergonomic design provided a natural point of aim and ease of maneuverability.
The checkered walnut grip adds to the overall handling, allowing for a firm and secure grip even in rapid-firing scenarios.
FN High Power
The FN High Power also shines in ergonomics with its iconic grip and well-balanced frame. The checkered wood panel grips offer a classic feel.
However, during testing, I noticed that the grip might feel a bit bulkier for shooters with smaller hands. The weight distribution is excellent, contributing to stability during shooting.
Winner
Compared to the FN High Power, the Springfield SA-35 takes the lead in ergonomics and handling. Its grip design is slightly more accommodating for a wider range of hand sizes, and the overall balance feels a tad more refined for quick aiming and shooting.
Pros & Cons of Springfield SA-35
Pros
- Lightweight and well-balanced.
- Modern sights for better target acquisition.
- Smooth trigger pull.
Cons
- May feel less robust compared to classic designs.
Pros & Cons of FN High Power
Pros
- Rich historical significance.
- Durable construction.
- Proven reliability over decades.
Cons
- Heavier trigger pull.
Similarities Between Springfield SA-35 & FN High Power
- Both are 9mm semi-automatic handguns.
- Similar overall length and height dimensions.
- Both feature a classic aesthetic in design.
- Comparable weight distribution and shooting experience.
- Both have a strong reputation in the firearms community.
Differences Between Springfield SA-35 & FN High Power
- SA-35 has a slightly shorter barrel length.
- FN High Power has a longer history and historical significance.
- SA-35 features modern, adjustable sights; FN High Power has traditional fixed sights.
- Trigger mechanism differs slightly in pull weight and feel.
Final Verdict
As a shooter who has rigorously tested both the Springfield SA-35 and the FN High Power, my final verdict is clear. While both firearms possess unique strengths and historical significance, one emerges as the preferred choice for a modern shooter.
After careful consideration and extensive field tests, my personal preference leans toward the Springfield SA-35.
This decision isn’t about mere specifications or features but rather the overall experience and adaptability of the firearm in various shooting scenarios. The SA-35, with its blend of classic design and modern enhancements, offers a more versatile and user-friendly experience.
FAQ’s
Is the SA-35 the same as a Browning Hi-Power?
No, the SA-35 is not the same as a Browning Hi-Power. While it takes inspiration from the Hi-Power, the SA-35 offers modern improvements like a better trigger, enhanced sights, and a more contemporary design.
What gun is similar to the Browning Hi-Power?
A similar gun to the Browning Hi-Power is the EAA Girsan MC P35, which is a very true copy of the Mk III Hi-Power with features like the magazine safety and ambidextrous safety.
Is the Hi-Power better than the 1911?
Preference between the Hi-Power and the 1911 varies. The Hi-Power has a higher ammo capacity, while the 1911 offers a better trigger and more customization options.
Is the SA-35 double action?
No, the Springfield Armory SA-35 is a single-action semiautomatic with a manual thumb safety.
