I’ve had the privilege of comparing two popular concealed carry guns: the SIG P938 Vs Glock 43.
My mission was simple: take these guns out in the field, put them through their paces, and figure out which one comes out on top.
In this article, I’m sharing my hands-on experience with you. We’ll dive into the details of each gun, compare their features, and see how they stack up against each other.
| Specification | SIG P938 | Glock 43 |
| Caliber | 9×19 | 9x19mm |
| Capacity | 6+1 or 7+1 with extended mag | Standard: 6 |
| Barrel Length | 3.0 inches | 3.41 inches |
| Overall Length | 5.9 inches | 6.26 inches |
| Height | 3.9 inches | 4.25 inches |
| Width | 1.1 inches | 1.06 inches |
| Weight | 16 oz (unloaded magazine) | 16.23 oz (w/o magazine) |
SIG P938
The SIG P938, known for its compactness and reliability, is a top pick for concealed carry enthusiasts.
Specs
- Caliber: 9×19
- Capacity: 6+1 or 7+1 with extended magazine
- Barrel Length: 3.0 inches
- Overall Length: 5.9 inches
- Height: 3.9 inches
- Width: 1.1 inches
- Weight: 16 ounces (with an unloaded magazine)
- Sights: SIGLITE Night Sights
- Trigger: Single Action Only, with a 7.5-8.5 lbs pull weight
Glock 43
The Glock 43, a slim and efficient choice for concealed carry, offers reliability in a sleek package.
Specs
- Caliber: 9x19mm
- Capacity: Standard: 6
- Barrel Length: 3.41 inches
- Overall Length: 6.26 inches
- Height: 4.25 inches
- Width: 1.06 inches
- Weight: 16.23 oz (without magazine), 17.99 oz (with empty magazine), 20.64 oz (with loaded magazine)
- Trigger Pull: 24 N
Features Comparison: SIG P938 VS Glock 43
1. Ergonomics and Feel
SIG P938
The SIG P938 boasts an all-metal frame, offering a substantial feel. Its compactness, combined with a magazine pinky extension, provides a comfortable grip, reminiscent of a mini 1911.
During field tests, its slim frame facilitated easy handling, particularly during rapid-fire scenarios. The metal construction contributes to a sturdy, confidence-inspiring hold.
Glock 43
The Glock 43, with its polymer frame, presents a lighter, more modern feel. The extended magazine improves grip, but the polymer texture feels less robust compared to the P938’s metal.
Despite this, its ergonomic design, particularly the more pronounced beavertail, aids in stable handling. In rapid shooting tests, the lightweight frame proved advantageous for quick maneuvering.
Winner
When comparing ergonomics, the SIG P938 slightly edges out, primarily due to its robust metal construction and classic design. Its ergonomic features, coupled with a solid feel, offer an advantage, especially in scenarios requiring quick, precise handling.
However, the Glock 43’s lighter frame and modern ergonomics shouldn’t be underestimated, as they provide significant benefits in different shooting situations.
2. Frame and Build
SIG P938
The SIG P938’s metal frame exudes durability and a classic firearm feel. In field tests, it demonstrated remarkable resilience, easily withstanding various environmental conditions.
Its solid construction ensures longevity and reliability, particularly noticeable during rapid-fire drills where stability is key. The metal frame adds a sense of security and robustness, which is palpable during handling and shooting.
Glock 43
The Glock 43’s polymer frame, while lighter than the P938’s, doesn’t compromise on toughness. Its resilience in field tests was impressive, handling different shooting conditions without faltering.
The pronounced beavertail design enhances grip stability, a feature I found particularly beneficial during extended shooting sessions. The polymer frame contributes to a more contemporary feel, balancing durability with a lighter, more agile handling experience.
Winner
Choosing a winner in frame and build is challenging. The SIG P938’s metal frame offers a
classic, reliable experience, while the Glock 43’s polymer frame provides modern resilience and comfort.
In my assessment, the Glock 43 takes a slight lead due to its ergonomic advantages and lighter frame, which prove beneficial in dynamic shooting scenarios, offering ease of handling without sacrificing durability.
3. Slide Design and Functionality
SIG P938 Slide
The SIG P938’s slide is notably shorter with rear and limited front serrations. Its all-metal build is robust but the front serrations lack effectiveness, a point I noted during quick reloads.
The rear hammer necessitates extra caution when racking, which can be a concern in high-stress situations. Despite these considerations, the slide’s solid construction and reliable performance in field tests underscore its quality.
Glock 43 Slide
The Glock 43’s slide, equipped with both rear and front serrations, offers user-friendly operation. Its hammerless design simplifies racking, an advantage I found useful under time constraints.
The slide’s simplicity and functionality were evident during field tests, facilitating easy chambering of rounds. This practical design aligns well with the Glock’s overall ethos of efficiency and reliability, making it a strong contender in terms of slide usability.
Winner
In the slide design category, the Glock 43 emerges as the winner. Its straightforward, hammerless design provides ease of use, particularly in high-pressure situations where quick action is necessary.
While the SIG P938’s slide is undeniably sturdy and reliable, the Glock 43’s slide offers greater practicality and efficiency, attributes that are crucial in a concealed carry context. Its user-friendly nature, combined with reliable performance, makes it the preferred choice in this category.
4. Quality and Durability
SIG P938
The SIG P938’s quality is evident from its all-metal construction, exuding a sense of durability and reliability. In my field tests, it withstood various conditions, from wet weather to dusty environments, without any performance hiccups.
The metal build not only adds to its robustness but also gives a premium feel. This gun seems built to last, maintaining functionality even after several drops and rough handling, a testament to its superior craftsmanship.
Glock 43
The Glock 43, known for its polymer frame, showcases Glock’s renowned durability and quality. Despite its lighter frame, it proved remarkably resilient in field tests.
The polymer material, far from being a drawback, contributes to its ability to withstand extreme conditions. I tested it in both high and low temperatures, and it functioned flawlessly. The Glock’s reputation for being nearly indestructible is well-deserved, as evidenced by its consistent performance regardless of external factors.
Winner
Deciding the winner in quality is tough, as both guns exhibit exceptional durability and reliability. The SIG P938 impresses with its classic all-metal build, giving a sense of timeless quality.
However, the Glock 43, with its innovative polymer frame, stands out for its ability to endure a wide range of conditions while maintaining a lighter profile.
Therefore, the Glock 43 edges out slightly, owing to its blend of enduring quality and adaptability, making it a slightly more versatile choice in diverse scenarios.
Pros & Cons: SIG P938
Pros
- Compact and easy to handle
- All-metal construction offers durability
- Excellent ergonomics, similar to a mini 1911
- SIGLITE Night Sights for better visibility
- Solid trigger performance with clear break
Cons
- Higher price point compared to Glock 43
- External thumb safety may not be preferred by all
- Hammer design can be a snag hazard
Pros & Cons: Glock 43
Pros
- Lightweight due to polymer frame
- Renowned Glock reliability and durability
- Good ergonomics with a pronounced beavertail
- Ample aftermarket accessories available
- More affordable price range
Cons
- Larger size compared to the P938
- Polymer magazines might feel less premium
- Stock sights are often considered subpar
Similarities between SIG P938 & Glock 43
- Both are chambered in 9×19 caliber.
- Compact designs suited for concealed carry.
- Similar grip lengths with magazine extensions.
- Both have standard capacity of 6 rounds.
- Designed for reliability and consistent performance.
Differences between SIG P938 & Glock 43
- SIG P938 has an all-metal frame; Glock 43 uses a polymer frame.
- P938 operates with a single-action trigger; Glock 43 has a Safe Action® system.
- SIG P938 includes SIGLITE Night Sights; Glock 43 often requires aftermarket sights.
- The P938 has a manual thumb safety; Glock 43 lacks an external safety.
- Glock 43 is slightly larger in overall dimensions compared to the P938.
Final Verdict
As a shooter who has rigorously tested both the SIG P938 and the Glock 43, making a final choice isn’t straightforward, as both guns have their distinct advantages.
However, after comprehensive consideration, the Glock 43 edges out as my top pick. This decision isn’t based on a single feature but rather the overall experience.
The Glock 43 strikes a balance between functionality, durability, and comfort, making it exceptionally suited for everyday concealed carry. Its lightweight design, combined with a resilient frame and user-friendly features, aligns well with the dynamic requirements of daily use.
FAQ’s
Is Sig or Glock better?
Both Sig sauer and Glock have their unique strengths. Preference depends on individual needs; some might prefer Glock’s compactness and reliability, while others may favor Sig’s versatility and magazine capacity.
Is a Sig P938 accurate?
Yes, the Sig P938 is known for its accuracy, combining the reliability of the P238 platform with the performance of a 9mm, making it a solid choice for a micro-compact.
Is the Sig P938 a good carry gun?
Absolutely, the Sig P938 is highly regarded for its reliability, accuracy, and concealability, making it an excellent choice for concealed carry.
Is a SIG P938 a 1911?
The Sig P938 is inspired by the 1911 design, especially in its operation and style, but it’s a modern, miniaturized version tailored for 9mm caliber.
