I’m a professional shooter, and I’ve taken the SIG P365 Vs Walther PPS M2 out in the field for a thorough comparison.
My aim? To determine which of these popular handguns stands out as the winner. I’ve tested them for comfort, accuracy, and overall performance. So, let’s dive into the details and see how each gun stacks up.
| Feature | SIG P365 | Walther PPS M2 |
| Caliber | 9mm | 9mm |
| Length | 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| Width | 1 inch | 1 inch |
| Barrel Length | 3.1 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Weight (unloaded) | 17.8 oz | 19.4 oz |
| Magazine Capacity | 10+1, 12-round optional | 6 rounds (7 & 8 rd available) |
| Sights | XRAY3 Day/Night Sights | Standard 3 dot (adjustable rear) |
Overview: SIG P365
The SIG P365 is a game-changer in compact pistols, known for its impressive capacity and concealability.
Specs
- Caliber: 9mm
- Length: 5.8 inches
- Height: 4.3 inches
- Width: 1 inch
- Barrel Length: 3.1 inches
- Trigger Pull Weight: 6 pounds
- Sights: XRAY3 Day/Night Sights
- Weight: 17.8 ounces (with empty magazine)
- Slide Material: Stainless Steel
- Slide Finish: Nitron
- Magazine Capacity: 10+1 (standard), 12-round (optional)
Overview: Walther PPS M2
The Walther PPS M2, a slightly larger counterpart, is known for its ergonomics and practicality in everyday carry.
Specs
- Caliber: 9mm
- Magazine Capacity: 6 rounds (7 & 8 rd available)
- Barrel Length: 3.2 inches
- Overall Length: 6.3 inches
- Width: 1.0 inch
- Weight (unloaded): 19.4 oz
- Action: striker-fired
- Frame Material: black polymer
SIG P365 Vs Walther PPS M2: A Detailed Comparison
1. Size and Concealability
SIG P365
The SIG P365 shines in its size and ease of concealment. With a length of 5.8 inches and a slim profile of just 1 inch in width, it’s a dream for concealed carry.
Its compact size doesn’t just make it easy to hide; it feels like it’s barely there when holstered. In my field tests, the P365 was incredibly easy to carry around all day without any noticeable discomfort.
Walther PPS M2
On the other hand, the Walther PPS M2, while slightly larger with a 6.3-inch length, still maintains a sleek profile. Its 1-inch width is identical to the P365, making it equally discreet for concealed carry.
During testing, I found its slightly larger size didn’t compromise comfort, especially when carried IWB or AIWB. It’s a bit more noticeable than the P365 but still exceptionally comfortable.
Winner
Compared to the Walther PPS M2, the SIG P365 takes the lead in size and concealability. Its smaller frame offers an advantage for those prioritizing minimal visibility and comfort in everyday carry.
2. Ergonomics and Grip
SIG P365
The SIG P365’s grip is well-designed, offering a comfortable hold despite its small size.
When I tested it, I found the grip to be surprisingly secure and steady, which is crucial for a compact firearm. The texturing is just right, providing enough grip without being abrasive.
Walther PPS M2
The Walther PPS M2, however, excels in ergonomics. The grip fits naturally in the hand, and its design seems to cater to a broader range of hand sizes. In my hands-on experience, the PPS M2 provided a more enjoyable shooting experience thanks to its well-contoured grip and balanced weight distribution.
Winner
Compared to the SIG P365, the Walther PPS M2 has a slight edge in ergonomics and grip. Its design offers a more comfortable and natural hold, which can be a significant factor for many shooters.
3. Trigger Performance
SIG P365
The trigger on the SIG P365 is smooth with a clean break. During testing, I appreciated the consistent pull and the tactile reset. For a compact gun, the trigger performance is impressive, offering a balance of responsiveness and control that enhances shooting accuracy.
Walther PPS M2
The Walther PPS M2’s trigger also performs admirably. It has a slightly heavier pull compared to the P365, which some shooters may prefer for controlled firing.
In my testing, the trigger felt secure and provided good feedback, although it lacked the crispness of the P365’s trigger.
Winner
When compared to the Walther PPS M2, the SIG P365’s trigger stands out. Its combination of a smooth pull and clean break gives it a slight advantage in trigger performance, making it a better choice for those who value precision in a compact firearm.
4. Sight System
SIG P365
The SIG P365’s XRAY3 Day/Night Sights are a standout feature. These sights offer excellent visibility in various lighting conditions.
In my field tests, I found the high-visibility green ring around the tritium vial on the front sight particularly useful for quick target acquisition. The serrated rear sight reduces glare effectively, enhancing accuracy in brighter environments.
Walther PPS M2
The Walther PPS M2 comes equipped with standard 3 dot factory sights. The front sight is fixed, while the rear sight is adjustable.
In my testing experience, these sights were reliable, but they lacked the advanced features of the P365’s sights. The lack of tritium means aftermarket upgrades might be necessary for low-light conditions.
Winner
Compared to the Walther PPS M2, the SIG P365 excels with its more advanced sight system. The XRAY3 Day/Night Sights provide superior visibility and quicker target acquisition, making it a clear winner in this category.
Pros & Cons of SIG P365
Pros
- Extremely compact and easy to conceal.
- Lightweight design (17.8 oz with empty mag) enhances comfort.
- XRAY3 Day/Night Sights provide excellent visibility.
- High magazine capacity for its size.
- Smooth slide operation, suitable for various hand strengths.
Cons
- Limited grip comfort compared to some competitors.
Pros & Cons of Walther PPS M2
Pros
- Comfortable and ergonomic grip.
- Adjustable rear sight for custom shooting preferences.
- Slightly heavier (19.4 oz) offers stable shooting.
- Less expensive magazines.
Cons
- Larger size reduces concealability.
Similarities between SIG P365 & Walther PPS M2
- Both chambered in 9mm.
- Striker-fired action in both pistols.
- Similar width (1 inch), aiding concealability.
- Durable, polymer frames.
- Targeted for everyday carry use.
Differences between SIG P365 & Walther PPS M2
- SIG P365 is lighter and more compact.
- SIG has higher standard magazine capacity.
- Walther PPS M2 has a longer barrel (3.2″ vs 3.1″).
- SIG P365 equipped with superior XRAY3 Day/Night Sights.
- Walther PPS M2 has a slightly longer overall length (6.3″).
- SIG’s slide operation is smoother.
- Price difference in magazines, with Walther’s being more affordable.
Final Verdict
After extensive testing and comparison, it’s time to draw a conclusion between the SIG P365 and the Walther PPS M2. Both handguns have their unique strengths, but one edges out as the more versatile choice for a variety of users. While the Walther PPS M2 has commendable ergonomics and accuracy, it’s the SIG P365 that emerges as the overall winner in most comparisons.
My choice leans towards the SIG P365 for several reasons. Its compactness and higher magazine capacity make it an ideal choice for everyday carry, offering a perfect blend of convenience and capability.
FAQ’s
Is SIG or Walther better?
The SIG P365 offers a higher magazine capacity compared to the Walther PPS M2, making it a better choice for those prioritizing capacity in a sub-compact handgun.
Is the Walther PPS M2 accurate?
Yes, the Walther PPS M2 is known for its excellent accuracy and ergonomics, making it a highly capable carry pistol.
What gun is comparable to the SIG P365?
The Taurus GX4 is comparable to the SIG P365 in terms of dimensions and features, with both having similar size and offering forward cocking serrations.
What does Walther PPS M2 stand for?
Walther PPS M2 stands for “Polizei-Pistole Schmal” or “Police Pistol Slim,” indicating its design for concealed carry and law enforcement use.
