As a shooter, I’ve had the chance to test out a lot of guns, but two that always spark debates are the Glock 34 Vs M&P 2.0.
These are popular choices among enthusiasts and professionals alike, so I took them to the field to see which stands out. Let’s dive in and take a closer look at each.
| Specifications | Glock 34 | M&P 2.0 |
| Caliber | 9x19mm | 9MM |
| Magazine Capacity | Standard 17 (Options: 19, 24, 31, 33, 10) | Standard 17 |
| Barrel Length | 5.31 inches | 4.25 inches |
| Weight With Empty Magazine | 25.93 oz | 27.8 oz |
| Overall Length | 8.82 inches | 7.4 inches |
| Overall Width | 1.30 inches | 1.16 inches |
| Height (Including Magazine) | 5.47 inches | 5.5 inches |
Overview Glock 34
The Glock 34 is a powerhouse in the 9x19mm class, known for its precision and reliability. It’s a go-to for competitive shooters and has earned a top spot in the shooting world.
Specs
- Caliber: 9x19mm
- Magazine Capacity: Standard 17 rounds (Options: 19, 24, 31, 33, 10)
- Barrel Length: 5.31 inches
- Weight With Empty Magazine: 25.93 oz
- Trigger Pull: 24 N
- Overall Length: 8.82 inches
- Slide Length: 8.15 inches
- Overall Width: 1.30 inches
- Slide Width: 1.0 inch
- Height (Including Magazine): 5.47 inches
Overview M&P 2.0
The M&P 2.0 is Smith & Wesson’s answer to modern tactical demands. It’s a full-sized pistol that brings remarkable ergonomics and durability to the table, appealing to both law enforcement and civilian shooters.
Specs
- Caliber: 9MM
- Frame Size: FULL
- Weight: 27.8 oz
- Width: 1.16 inches
- Height: 5.5 inches
- Capacity: 17 rounds
Features Comparison: Glock 34 Vs M&P 2.0
1. Trigger Quality and Feel
Glock 34
The Glock 34’s trigger is a standout feature. It has a predictable and consistent pull with a clean break, which is crucial for precision shooting.
During my testing, the trigger contributed significantly to the accuracy and overall shooting experience. It’s neither too light nor too heavy, striking a perfect balance for both competitive and casual shooters.
The reset is short and tactile, allowing for quick follow-up shots. This level of consistency in the trigger pull is a big advantage in scenarios where every shot counts.
M&P 2.0
The M&P 2.0’s trigger is markedly improved from its predecessors. It’s crisper and more responsive, providing a clear tactile feedback.
The trigger reset is distinct and aids in faster shooting. In field tests, this translated to a more enjoyable shooting experience and contributed to improved accuracy.
The trigger pull is smooth, and the overall feel is quite ergonomic. For shooters who prioritize a tactile and responsive trigger, the M&P 2.0 delivers impressively.
Winner
Choosing a winner in the trigger quality and feel category is tough, as both the Glock 34 and the M&P 2.0 have excellent triggers. However, the Glock 34 edges out slightly.
2. Handling
Glock 34
The Glock 34 is designed with ergonomics in mind. The grip fits comfortably in the hand, and the weight balance feels just right. During my testing, handling the Glock 34 was intuitive.
The longer barrel aids in accuracy, making it a favorite for competitive shooters. The slide is smooth, and overall, the pistol feels solid and well-constructed, enhancing the shooting experience.
M&P 2.0
The M&P 2.0 impresses with its ergonomics. The grip texture is superb, offering a secure hold even in wet conditions.
The weight distribution is excellent, and it feels slightly more comfortable in the hand compared to the Glock 34, especially during prolonged use. The controls are well-placed, and the overall design is user-friendly, making it a strong contender in terms of
ergonomics and handling.
Winner
In the ergonomics and handling department, the M&P 2.0 takes the lead. Its superior grip texture and weight distribution make it more comfortable to handle, especially during extended shooting sessions.
While the Glock 34 is no slouch in this category, the M&P 2.0 offers a slightly better experience in ergonomics and handling, compared to the Glock 34.
3. Accuracy and Performance
Glock 34
The Glock 34 is renowned for its accuracy. The longer barrel length contributes to this, providing a longer sight radius which aids in precision shooting.
During my field tests, the Glock 34 consistently hit targets with remarkable precision. Its performance is reliable, with a smooth trigger pull and consistent cycling of rounds.
M&P 2.0
The M&P 2.0 is also a strong performer in terms of accuracy. It shoots straight and true, and the recoil management is impressive.
The trigger has a crisp break, which aids in accurate shooting. However, when compared to the Glock 34, it feels just a tad less precise in terms of shot placement, especially at longer distances.
Winner
For accuracy and performance, the Glock 34 comes out on top. Its longer barrel and superior sight radius give it an edge, especially in precision shooting scenarios.
While the M&P 2.0 is a formidable opponent in this category, the Glock 34’s consistent accuracy and performance make it the winner, compared to the M&P 2.0.
Pros & Cons Glock 34
Pros
- High Magazine Capacity: Offers options up to 33 rounds.
- Long Barrel Length: Enhances accuracy and stability.
- Lightweight Design: Easier to handle and maneuver.
- Adjustable Trigger Pull: Customizable to shooter preference.
- Wide Range of Accessories: Extensive aftermarket support.
Cons
- Basic Grip Texture: May require aftermarket enhancements for better grip.
Pros & Cons M&P 2.0
Pros
- Ergonomic Design: Comfortable grip and better recoil management.
- Improved Trigger: Crisp and responsive compared to older models.
- Durable Construction: Built for rugged use.
- Balanced Weight Distribution: Aids in accuracy and control.
- Versatile for Various Users: Suitable for both law enforcement and civilian use.
Cons
- Less Customizable: Fewer aftermarket options than Glock.
Similarities between Glock 34 & M&P 2.0
- Both have a caliber of 9MM.
- Standard magazine capacity of 17 rounds.
- Similar height dimensions (around 5.5 inches).
- Full-sized frame design for both.
- Widely used by law enforcement and competitive shooters.
Differences between Glock 34 & M&P 2.0
- Glock 34 has a longer barrel length (5.31 inches) compared to M&P 2.0.
- M&P 2.0 is slightly heavier (27.8 oz) than Glock 34 (25.93 oz).
- Glock 34 offers more magazine capacity options, including high-capacity choices.
- M&P 2.0 has a more ergonomic grip and improved trigger feel.
- Glock 34 has a wider slide width (1.0 inch) compared to M&P 2.0.
- M&P 2.0 has a narrower overall width (1.16 inches) than Glock 34 (1.30 inches).
Final Verdict
After thoroughly testing both the Glock 34 and the M&P 2.0, making a final choice isn’t straightforward, as each gun has its unique strengths.
Between the two, the Glock 34 slightly edges out as my personal favorite. Its versatility, especially with magazine capacity and the range of aftermarket accessories, makes it a more adaptable choice for various shooting scenarios.
FAQ’s
Is M&P Shield better than Glock?
The M&P Shield and Glock serve different purposes. The Shield is compact and suitable for concealed carry, while the Glock, especially models like the 19, offers better recoil management due to its size.
Why Glock 34 for competition?
The Glock 34 is designed for competition due to its extended barrel and slide, offering greater accuracy and a longer sight radius, crucial for target engagement.
Is the M&P 2.0 a good carry gun?
Yes, the M&P 2.0, particularly the Compact version, is very accurate and reliable, making it a great choice for a carry gun.
What are the advantages of the Glock 34?
The Glock 34’s main advantage is its longer sight radius due to the extended slide, enhancing accuracy, especially for long-distance shooting.
Is the M&P 2.0 metal?
The M&P 2.0 has a metal frame variant, offering a lightweight and rigid structure for enhanced performance.
