Hey there! I’m a professional shooter who’s had the pleasure of testing the Glock 34 Vs Beretta 92FS.
Today, I’m here to share my experience and insights on these two firearms. Both have their unique features and quirks, and I’ve put them through their paces in the field to see which one comes out on top.
| Feature | Glock 34 | Beretta 92FS |
| Caliber | 9x19mm | 9x19mm |
| Magazine Capacity | 17 (up to 33) rounds | Typically 15 rounds |
| Barrel Length | 5.31 inches | 4.9 inches |
| Weight | 25.93 oz (empty mag) | 33.3 oz (empty mag) |
| Trigger Mechanism | Striker-fired | Hammer-fired |
Overview of Glock 34
The Glock 34 is a sleek, precision-engineered firearm widely recognized for its accuracy and reliability.
Specs
- Caliber: 9x19mm
- Magazine Capacity: Standard 17 rounds (Optional: 19, 24, 31, 33, 10)
- Barrel Length: 5.31 inches
- Weight With Empty Magazine: 25.93 oz
- Trigger Pull: 24 N
- Overall Length: 8.82 inches
- Slide Length: 8.15 inches
- Overall Width: 1.30 inches
- Slide Width: 1.0 inch
- Height (Including Magazine): 5.47 inches
Overview of Beretta 92FS
The Beretta 92FS is an iconic pistol known for its classic design and a favorite among many firearm enthusiasts.
Specs
- Caliber: 9X19
- Magazine Capacity: 15 rounds
- Barrel Length: 4.9 inches
- Weight Unloaded: 33.3 oz
- Overall Width: 1.5 inches
- Height: 5.4 inches
Features Comparison: Glock 34 Vs Beretta 92FS
1. Handling
Glock 34
The Glock 34 feels surprisingly light in hand, with its weight of just 25.93 oz when unloaded. The grip is comfortable, though it might feel a bit blocky to some.
Its balance is quite good, making it easy to handle during rapid firing. The overall width of 1.30 inches contributes to a firm and manageable grip, especially for those with larger hands.
Beretta 92FS
The Beretta 92FS, compared to the Glock, feels more substantial with its 33.3 oz weight. Its grip design is highly ergonomic, fitting well in a variety of hand sizes.
This full-sized pistol offers a sense of sturdiness and control. The wider grip of 1.5 inches and a slightly heavier frame contribute to its solid feel, which many shooters find reassuring.
Winner
Both guns have their merits in terms of ergonomics. The Glock 34 is lighter and might be preferable for those who value agility and ease of handling.
However, the Beretta 92FS takes the lead for shooters who appreciate a more solid and substantial feel. Its ergonomic design offers greater comfort and control, especially under prolonged use. So, compared to the Glock, the Beretta wins in this category.
2. Accuracy and Shooting Performance
Glock 34
The Glock 34 is designed with accuracy in mind. Its longer barrel of 5.31 inches aids in achieving more precise shots. The Glock 34 showed excellent accuracy during field testing, especially at mid-range targets.
The trigger pull is smooth, though some shooters might find it a bit heavy at 24 N.
Beretta 92FS
The Beretta 92FS, with its 4.9-inch barrel, also demonstrates commendable accuracy. It’s particularly noteworthy for its smooth trigger and ease of follow-up shots.
In my testing, the Beretta performed exceptionally well in target shooting, with its ergonomic design contributing to steadier aiming and less fatigue.
Winner
This is a close call. The Glock 34, with its longer barrel, offers a slight edge in terms of inherent accuracy. However, the Beretta 92FS counters with better ergonomics that aid in steady shooting.
In practical terms, the difference is minimal, but the Glock 34 edges out slightly ahead in this category, especially for experienced shooters who can take advantage of its longer barrel.
3. Reliability and Durability
Glock 34
Glocks are known for their reliability, and the Glock 34 is no exception. It handles various types of ammunition with ease and shows consistent performance even in adverse conditions. Its simple design and fewer parts contribute to its robustness and lower likelihood of mechanical issues.
Beretta 92FS
The Beretta 92FS also boasts impressive reliability. It’s a firearm with a legacy of use in military and law enforcement, indicating its dependability.
In field tests, it cycled different ammunition types without a hitch, and its build quality suggests long-term durability.
Winner
Both firearms are extremely reliable, but the Glock 34 takes a slight lead in this category. Its simpler design and track record of enduring tough conditions give it an edge.
The Beretta 92FS is no slouch in this department, but compared to the Glock, the latter’s reputation for reliability in a wider range of environments and conditions makes it the winner here.
Pros & Cons of Glock 34
Pros
- Lightweight and easy to handle (25.93 oz with empty magazine).
- High magazine capacity options (standard 17 rounds, up to 33).
- Longer barrel length (5.31 inches) for improved accuracy.
- Reliable performance in various conditions.
- Simplistic design with fewer parts, enhancing durability.
Cons
- Blocky grip might not suit all hand sizes.
Pros & Cons of Beretta 92FS
Pros
- Classic and elegant Italian design, visually appealing.
- Ergonomic grip and solid feel (33.3 oz unloaded weight).
- Shorter and crisper trigger pull, beneficial for quick shooting.
- Hammer-fired system preferred by traditional shooters.
- Decocker safety feature for enhanced safety.
Cons
- Heavier compared to the Glock 34, which might affect handling.
Similarities Between Glock 34 & Beretta 92FS
- Both chambered in 9x19mm caliber.
- Both designed for defense and tactical use.
- Each has a full-size frame, suitable for target shooting and duty carry.
- Renowned for reliability and durability in their category.
- Widely used and respected in the shooting community.
Differences Between Glock 34 & Beretta 92FS
- Glock 34 is striker-fired; Beretta 92FS is hammer-fired.
- Glock has a longer barrel (5.31 inches) compared to Beretta (4.9 inches).
- Glock 34 is lighter (25.93 oz) than Beretta 92FS (33.3 oz).
Final Verdict
After extensive testing and comparison between the Glock 34 and the Beretta 92FS, the decision on which is the superior firearm isn’t just about tallying up features or specs. It’s about understanding how each gun fits into the specific needs and preferences of the shooter.
Choosing a winner is tough, but for me, the Beretta 92FS edges out slightly. This doesn’t take away from the Glock 34’s exceptional performance and reliability, but in the end, the Beretta 92FS aligns more closely with my shooting style and preferences.
FAQ’s
Is the Beretta 92FS better than Glock?
Whether the Beretta 92 is better than Glock depends on personal preference. Both are reliable, but the Beretta has unique features that some may prefer over Glock’s simplicity.
Why is Glock 34 popular for competition?
The Glock 34 is popular in competitions for its extended barrel and slide, providing greater accuracy and a longer sight radius, crucial for precise target engagement.
Is the Glock 34 accurate?
Yes, the Glock 34 is accurate, especially the Gen 5 models, known to shoot tight groups at 25 yards, outperforming many other Glock models.
Is a Beretta 92FS worth buying?
Yes, the Beretta 92FS is worth buying. It’s renowned for reliability and often outperforms many modern pistols in accuracy and durability.
