I’ve had the unique chance to test two amazing firearms: the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 Vs Springfield XDM Elite.
Choosing the right gun isn’t just about specs; it’s about how it feels in your hands and performs in the field. I’m diving deep into my hands-on experience with these two models in this article.
I aim to help you figure out which one might be the winner for your needs.
Specification | Springfield XD-S MOD.2 | Springfield XD-M |
Type | Striker fired, semiautomatic | Striker-fired semiauto centerfire |
Cartridge | 9mm | 9mm Luger |
Capacity | 7+1 or 9+1 | 22+1 |
Overall Length | 6.3 inches | 8.3 inches |
Height | 4.4 in.; 5 in. with mag extension | 6.6 inches with mag |
Width | 0.9 inch | 1.3 inches |
Barrel Length | 3.3 inches | 5.25 inches |
Weight | 1 lb., 7 oz. | 29.3 oz. |
Overview of Springfield XD-S MOD.2
The Springfield XD-S MOD.2 is a compact powerhouse designed for concealed carry with no compromise on firepower.
Specs
- Type: Striker fired, semiautomatic
- Cartridge: 9mm
- Capacity: 7+1 or 9+1
- Overall Length: 6.3 inches
- Height: 4.4 inches; 5 inches with mag extension
- Width: 0.9 inch
- Barrel Length: 3.3 inches
- Weight: 1 pound, 7 ounces
Overview of Springfield XD-M Elite
The Springfield XD-M Elite is a high-capacity, full-size pistol offering precision and performance for the serious shooter.
Specs
- Type: Striker-fired semiauto centerfire
- Caliber: 9mm Luger
- Capacity: 22+1
- Barrel: 5.25 inches
- Overall Length/Height/Width: 8.3/6.6 (with mag)/1.3 inches
- Weight: 29.3 ounces
- Sights: Fully adjustable rear, red fiber-optic front
- Trigger: META, 5.5 lb. pull (measured)
Features Comaprison: Springfield XD-S MOD.2 VS Springfield XD-M Elite
1. Overall Size and Concealability
Springfield XD-S MOD.2: The Springfield XD-S MOD.2 shines in its compact form. Measuring only 6.3 inches in length and 4.4 inches in height, which extends to 5 inches with the magazine extension, it’s the epitome of a concealable firearm.
Its slender 0.9-inch width makes it nearly imperceptible when carried concealed. In practical field tests, this gun slipped easily into a holster, remaining out of sight and out of mind yet always within easy reach.
Springfield XD-M
In contrast, the Springfield XD-M, measuring a lengthier 8.3 inches and a taller 6.6 inches with the magazine, is significantly less concealable. Its 1.3-inch width adds to its bulkier profile.
While this size increase does hinder its ability to be concealed as effectively as the MOD.2, it offers a more robust and substantial grip. This is particularly advantageous in scenarios requiring rapid, repeated firing where a larger grip aids in control and stability.
Winner
For those prioritizing concealability, the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 outperforms the XD-M. Its significantly more compact design makes it a top choice for concealed carry.
2. Handling and Ergonomics
Springfield XD-S MOD.2
The smaller frame of the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 is a standout feature. It fits snugly into the hand, offering a secure and comfortable grip. In field tests, its lightweight and compact size facilitated nimble maneuvering and quick targeting.
Especially in situations where quick response and ease of movement are crucial, this gun performed admirably, proving that size can indeed make a significant difference in handling.
Springfield XD-M
The Springfield XD-M, with its larger and heftier build, provides a different ergonomic experience. The substantial grip is a boon for shooters who prefer a more significant hold, particularly beneficial during rapid-fire sequences where control is key.
The larger frame also helps manage recoil more effectively, allowing for quicker reacquisition of targets after each shot. This makes the XD-M a more suitable option for scenarios where sustained, accurate fire is necessary.
Winner
The Springfield XD-M edges out the MOD.2 in handling and ergonomics. Its larger size and weight distribution make for a stable and controlled shooting experience, particularly in rapid-fire situations or where precision is paramount.
3. Sights and Accuracy
Springfield XD-S MOD.2
The standard sights on the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 are adequate for most close-range applications.
However, during field testing, I observed some limitations in accuracy at longer distances, likely attributable to its shorter barrel length. While the sights are reliable for quick, close-range targeting, they fall short when precision at extended ranges is needed.
Springfield XD-M
The XD-M’s sighting system, featuring a fully adjustable rear sight and a red fiber-optic front sight, significantly enhances accuracy, particularly at longer ranges.
The longer barrel length also plays a crucial role in improving precision. These features combined make the XD-M a formidable firearm for accurate shooting, offering a clear advantage in scenarios where hitting distant targets is critical.
Winner
When it comes to sights and accuracy, the Springfield XD-M stands out compared to the XD-S MOD.2. Its advanced sighting system and longer barrel length offer significant benefits in precision shooting, especially at greater distances.
4. Trigger Quality
Springfield XD-S MOD.2
The XD-S MOD.2’s trigger has a smooth, consistent pull that I found quite reliable during testing. Its responsiveness was impressive, allowing for quick successive shots. This quality is crucial in scenarios where reaction time is key.
Springfield XD-M
The XD-M features the META (Match Enhanced Trigger Assembly) system, boasting a 5.5 lb pull. In my experience, this provided a crisp, clean break with each shot, enhancing my shooting accuracy and overall control.
Winner
The Springfield XD-M excels in this feature compared to the XD-S MOD.2. The META system offers a superior trigger experience, making it ideal for both competitive shooting and precise targeting.
Pros & Cons: Springfield XD-S MOD.2
Pros
- Highly concealable and compact
- Lightweight, easy to carry
- Smooth trigger pull
Cons
- Less suitable for long-range accuracy
Pros & Cons: Springfield XD-M
Pros
- High capacity magazine
- Superior trigger system (META)
- Better suited for long-range accuracy
Cons
- Heavier than XD-S MO.2
Similarities Between Springfield XD-S MOD.2 & Springfield XD-M
- Both are striker-fired, semi-automatic handguns.
- Each is designed for 9mm cartridges.
- Both models have a reputation for reliability and durability.
- Both feature ergonomic designs for better handling.
Differences Between Springfield XD-S MOD.2 & Springfield XD-M
- XD-S MOD.2 is more compact and lighter than the XD-M.
- XD-M has a higher capacity compared to XD-S MOD.2.
- XD-M features the META trigger system, which is more advanced than the trigger of the XD-S MOD. 2.
- XD-S MOD.2 is better suited for concealed carry, whereas XD-M excels in competitive shooting scenarios.
- XD-M has a longer barrel, enhancing long-range shooting accuracy.
- The XD-M is equipped with fully adjustable rear and fiber-optic front sights, unlike the XD-S MOD.2.
Final Verdict
After thoroughly testing both the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 and the Springfield XD-M, it’s time to draw some conclusions.
While both firearms have their unique strengths and cater to different needs, one emerged as a standout for me. Considering the overall experience from handling to performance in various scenarios, my choice tilts toward the Springfield XD-M.
This decision isn’t based on a single feature but rather on a holistic assessment of how each gun performs under diverse conditions.
FAQ’s
What is the difference between Springfield XD-S and XD E?
The Springfield XD-S is smaller and more concealable than the XD-E but has more noticeable recoil and a slightly lower capacity.
Are XD-S and XDM magazines the same?
No, XD-S and XDM magazines are not the same due to the different widths optimized for the calibers they were designed for.
Did Springfield discontinue the XD-S?
Yes, Springfield has discontinued the XD-S Mod.2 model.
What does the ‘M’ stand for in Springfield XDM?
The ‘M’ in Springfield XDM stands for ‘more’, indicating its enhanced features and capabilities over the standard XD model.