Springfield XD-S MOD.2 Vs Springfield XD-S Compact

Last Update:

I’m a professional shooter with the unique opportunity to test out two popular guns in the field: the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 Vs Springfield XD-S Compact. 

I’m diving deep into a side-by-side comparison of these two models to figure out which one takes the crown.

My aim is to give you a clear, straightforward insight into how these guns perform in real-world conditions. I’ll be sharing my personal experiences and observations, breaking down the specs, and highlighting the features of each model.

FeatureSpringfield XD-S MOD.2Springfield XD-S Compact
TypeStriker-fired, semiautomaticStriker-fired, semiautomatic
Cartridge9mm9mm
Capacity7+1 or 9+17+1
Overall Length6.3 in6.3 in
Height4.4 in; 5 in with mag extension4.4 in
Barrel Length3.3 in3.3 in
Weight1 lb., 7 oz.23 oz.

Springfield XD-S MOD.2

The Springfield XD-S MOD.2 is a striker-fired, semiautomatic marvel that’s compact and reliable.

Specs

  • Type: Striker fired, semiautomatic
  • Cartridge: 9mm
  • Capacity: 7+1 or 9+1
  • Overall Length: 6.3 in
  • Height: 4.4 in; 5 in with mag extension
  • Width: 0.9 in
  • Barrel Length: 3.3 in
  • Weight: 1 lb., 7 oz.

Springfield XD-S Compact

The Springfield XD-S Compact is a sub-compact version that packs a punch in a smaller frame.

Specs

  • Caliber: 9mm
  • Capacity: 7 + 1 rounds
  • Overall Length: 6.3 inches
  • Barrel Length: 3.3 inches
  • Height: 4.4 inches
  • Weight (empty): 23 ounces
  • Trigger Pull: 5.5 to 7.7 pounds
  • Construction: Polymer frame, steel Melonite barrel, forged steel slide
  • Sights: Front, fiber optic; rear, dovetail

Features Comparison: Springfield XD-S MOD.2 VS Springfield XD-S Compact

1. Size and Concealability 

Springfield XD-S MOD.2

The XD-S MOD.2 stands out for its exceptional size and concealability. With a slim profile measuring a mere 0.9 inches in width, it’s a standout choice for covert carry. 

This ultra-thin design not only ensures it remains virtually invisible under most clothing but also adds to the comfort, particularly for inside-the-waistband carry. During extensive field tests, I found this sleekness to be a major advantage. 

Its discreet presence allows for more flexibility in wardrobe choices and reduces the likelihood of printing, even under lighter garments. The MOD.2’s slender build also contributes to a less cumbersome carry experience throughout the day, making it a top pick for prolonged wear.

Springfield XD-S Compact

The Springfield XD-S Compact, while still adept at concealment, presents a slightly more noticeable profile compared to the MOD.2.

Its slightly greater bulk, though not overly cumbersome, becomes more apparent in specific carry scenarios, especially when dressing with tighter clothing. During my testing, I noted that the Compact, while manageable, required more attention to conceal effectively. Its added bulk, however, does not significantly detract from its overall suitability as a concealed-carry firearm. 

It still maintains a relatively low profile and can be comfortably carried with a bit of wardrobe adjustment. The Compact’s slightly larger size may be noticeable, but it doesn’t significantly hinder its concealability.

Winner

In the size and concealability category, the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 clearly takes the lead. Its ultra-thin and compact design, compared to the Compact, makes it an exemplary choice for concealed carry enthusiasts who prioritize minimalism and comfort. 

The difference in concealability is particularly noticeable in situations that require extended carry periods or less forgiving clothing choices.

2. Ergonomics and Handling 

Springfield XD-S MOD.2

The XD-S MOD.2 shines in its ergonomic design. Holding and handling this firearm feels incredibly natural and intuitive. The grip and trigger reach are thoughtfully balanced to accommodate a wide range of hand sizes, offering an optimal shooting stance. 

During my practical tests, I found these ergonomics to play a pivotal role in shooting performance. The comfortable grip and well-placed controls made it easier to maintain a consistent grip and shooting posture, leading to noticeably improved accuracy. 

This was particularly evident in scenarios that demanded rapid firing or quick target re-acquisition. The MOD.2’s ergonomic advantage lends itself to a more confident and controlled shooting experience, making it a reliable choice for both novice and experienced shooters.

Springfield XD-S Compact

The Springfield XD-S Compact offers a slightly bulkier grip, which provides a more substantial feel in the hand. This design aspect, compared to the slimmer MOD.2, can be a significant advantage for shooters with larger hands or those who prefer a more robust grip. 

In field tests, the Compact’s larger grip size offered a more solid and reassuring hold, contributing to better control during rapid shooting sequences. 

Winner

Choosing a winner in ergonomics and handling largely depends on personal preference and hand size. However, for a balanced blend of comfort and control, the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 edges ahead. 

Its ergonomic design, compared to the Compact, caters to a broader range of shooters, providing a more comfortable and intuitive experience. 

3. Sight Visibility and Accuracy

Springfield XD-S MOD.2

The Springfield XD-S MOD.2 excels in the arena of sight visibility and accuracy. The inclusion of a fiber optic front sight paired with a dovetail rear sight creates a highly visible and intuitive aiming system. 

During field testing, this sight configuration proved to be a significant asset in a variety of lighting conditions. The bright front sight quickly draws the eye, facilitating rapid target acquisition and follow-up shots. This feature was particularly beneficial in scenarios that required quick transitions between targets or shooting in less-than-ideal lighting. 

Springfield XD-S Compact

The Compact model also features a commendable sight setup, including a fiber optic front and dovetail rear sight. However, in comparison to the MOD.2, the Compact’s sights required a slightly more focused effort to achieve the same level of quick and precise shooting. 

During testing, I found that while these sights are effective, they didn’t provide the immediate ease of target acquisition that the MOD.2’s sights offered. 

The Compact’s sights are still of high quality and deliver reliable accuracy, but they may necessitate a bit more practice to master, especially for shooters who are new to this sight configuration.

Winner 

When it comes to sight visibility and accuracy, the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 stands out as the winner. Its sight system, compared to the Compact, offers superior visibility and a more user-friendly experience. 

The MOD.2’s fiber optic front sight makes a significant difference in quick target engagement and precise shot placement. This, coupled with the pistol’s overall ergonomic design, makes the MOD.2 a top choice for shooters who prioritize quick, accurate, and reliable target acquisition.

4. Trigger Quality and Feel

Springfield XD-S MOD.2

The Springfield XD-S MOD.2 boasts a trigger that’s a true standout in its class. The sensation of pulling this trigger is akin to a seamless, fluid motion, culminating in a crisp and clean break. 

Throughout my extensive field testing, what struck me the most was the remarkable consistency this trigger offered. Each pull felt identical to the last, instilling a sense of reliability and predictability that greatly enhanced my shooting performance. 

The pull weight strikes a perfect balance, being neither excessively light nor unduly heavy. 

Springfield XD-S Compact

Turning to the Springfield XD-S Compact, the trigger experience presents a slightly different character. The first thing I noticed during my tests was the firmer resistance offered by the trigger. 

This stiffer pull, while still maintaining a reliable performance, demands a bit more intention and control from the shooter. Some may find this increased resistance advantageous, particularly when aiming for controlled, deliberate shots. 

However, in comparison to the MOD.2, achieving the same level of pinpoint accuracy required a bit more effort and adjustment. The tactile feedback from the Compact’s trigger is robust, providing a clear indication of the firing sequence, but it lacks the finesse and effortless action of the MOD.2.

Winner 

In the category of trigger quality and feel, the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 clearly outshines the Compact. The MOD.2’s trigger, compared to its Compact counterpart, delivers a more refined and fluid experience. 

This superiority is especially evident in the smoothness of the pull and the consistency of the break, which are pivotal factors in achieving high precision and control in various shooting situations.

Pros & Cons of Springfield XD-S MOD.2

Pros

  • Slim and highly concealable
  • Excellent trigger quality
  • High visibility sights
  • Balanced ergonomics

Cons

  • May not suit shooters with larger hands

Pros & Cons of Springfield XD-S Compact:

Pros

  • More substantial grip size
  • Higher capacity
  • Versatile with different magazine options
  • Durable construction

Cons

  • Stiffer trigger pull

Similarities Between Springfield XD-S MOD.2 & Springfield XD-S Compact

  • Both are striker-fired, semiautomatic pistols
  • Chambered in 9mm
  • Polymer frames with steel Melonite barrels
  • Feature front fiber optic and rear dovetail sights
  • Overall length of 6.3 inches
  • Barrel length of 3.3 inches

Differences Between Springfield XD-S MOD.2 & Springfield XD-S Compact

  • MOD.2 is slimmer with a width of 0.9 inches
  • Compact is slightly bulkier than MOD.2
  • MOD.2 has a single-stack magazine design
  • Compact uses a double-stack magazine
  • Trigger pull on MOD.2 is smoother compared to Compact
  • MOD.2 is more focused on concealability
  • Compact offers a fuller grip and higher capacity
  • Weight differs: MOD.2 is 1 lb., 7 oz., Compact is 23 ounces

Final Verdict

After thorough testing and comparison, it’s time to draw a conclusion between the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 and the Springfield XD-S Compact. 

Both pistols have their unique strengths and cater to different preferences, but one has edged out as the winner in my book. The decision wasn’t easy, as both guns exhibit exemplary performance, reliability, and quality. However, considering the overall balance of features, the Springfield XD-S MOD.2 emerges as my top choice.

The MOD.2’s winning edge comes from its superior blend of ergonomics, concealability, and shooting experience. Its sleek design, combined with outstanding ergonomics and a highly intuitive trigger, makes it an exceptional firearm for a variety of shooters. 

FAQs

What is the difference between XD-S and XDM compact?

The XD-S series is a single-stack design, while the Springfield XDM is a double-stack. Other differences are mostly cosmetic.

What is the difference between XD-S and XD-S Mod 2?

The XD-S Mod.2 features an updated grip texture that’s sleeker yet still ensures a solid grip, especially after extensive shooting.

What is the difference between Springfield XDE and XD-S?

The XD-S is smaller and more concealable than the XD-E but has slightly harder recoil control and a capacity of 7+1 compared to XD-E’s 8+1.

One Request?

I worked hard on this post to help the shooters community. it would help me a lot if you consider sharing it on social media network

BecauseSharing Is Caring..

Because Sharing Is Caring..

Photo of author

AUTHOR

I'm Micheal, an avid shooter and hunting enthusiast from Texas. I'm a recreational shooter who loves to spend time at the range and enjoy learning about new firearms and gears. I love to write about guns and share my passion for shooting with others.

Leave a Comment