As a professional shooter, I’ve had the unique opportunity to test and compare the Glock 43 Vs M&P Shield in real-world scenarios.
These two guns have been hot topics in the shooting community, and for good reason. Both are renowned for their reliability and performance, especially in concealed carry situations.
But which one takes the top spot? Let’s dive into a detailed comparison to find out.
| Feature | Glock 43 | M&P Shield |
| Caliber | 9x19mm | 9mm |
| Magazine Capacity | 6 rounds | 7, 8 rounds |
| Barrel Length | 3.41 inches | Comparable |
| Weight | 17.99 oz | 20.8 oz |
| Trigger Pull | Approx. 5.4 lbs | Comparable |
| Overall Length | 6.26 inches | 6.1 inches |
| Slide Length | 6.06 inches | Comparable |
| Width | 1.06 inches | 0.95 inches |
| Height (Incl. Magazine) | 4.25 inches | 4.6 inches |
Overview of Glock 43
The Glock 43 is a slimline, subcompact pistol renowned for its lightweight design and reliability. It’s an ideal choice for concealed carry.
Specs
- Caliber: 9x19mm
- System: Safe Action®
- Magazine Capacity Standard: 6 rounds
- Barrel Length: 3.41 inches
- Weight (with empty magazine): 17.99 oz
- Trigger Pull: Approximately 5.4 lbs (24 N)
- Overall Length: 6.26 inches
- Slide Length: 6.06 inches
- Overall Width: 1.06 inches
- Slide Width: 0.87 inch
- Height (including Magazine): 4.25 inches
Overview of M&P Shield
The M&P SHIELD M2.0 is a micro-compact firearm known for its ergonomic design and enhanced features. It’s a versatile choice for personal defense.
Specs
- Caliber: 9MM
- Size: Micro-Compact
- Capacity: 7, 8 rounds
- Barrel Length: Comparable to Glock 43
- Weight: 20.8 oz
- Trigger Pull: Comparable to Glock 43
- Overall Length: 6.1 inches
- Slide Length: Comparable to Glock 43
- Overall Width: 0.95 inches
- Slide Width: Slightly less than Glock 43
- Height: 4.6 inches
Features Comparison: Glock 43 Vs M&P Shield
1. Concealability
Glock 43
The Glock 43 shines in concealability. It’s compact and slim, making it a breeze for pocket carry or tucking under a shirt.
It was almost like the Glock 43 wasn’t even there during my field test. Its smaller dimensions, especially its thinness, really make a difference when it comes to discreet carry.
M&P Shield
While still compact, the Shield is slightly bulkier than the Glock 43. My test found that it can still be concealed effectively, but it doesn’t have the same ‘disappear’ factor the Glock 43 has.
The Shield fits well in a holster but is a tad more noticeable, especially in tighter clothing.
Winner
For concealability, the Glock 43 takes the lead. Its smaller frame and lighter weight offer a significant advantage in concealment, especially in situations like a pocket carry or under a tucked-in shirt. It edges out the Shield as less obtrusive and easier to conceal.
2. Ergonomics and Grip
Glock 43
The Glock 43’s grip feels less blocky and more comfortable in hand compared to other models. During testing, I appreciated its ergonomic design, which provided a solid grip, even with its smaller size.
However, the pinky extension on the magazine felt unnecessary, as it didn’t add to the gun’s capacity.
M&P Shield
The Shield’s grip is more rounded, yet it feels somewhat bulky, resembling a ‘one-by-four’ plank. In my hands, it was comfortable but not as snug as the Glock 43.
The grip length is better for recoil control, offering some leverage for the pinky.
Winner
In terms of ergonomics and grip, the Glock 43 edges out slightly. It feels less blocky and more natural in hand, though the Shield’s longer grip does offer a slight advantage in recoil control. But for overall hand fit and comfort, the Glock 43 is the winner.
3. Trigger Mechanism
Glock 43
The trigger mechanism on the Glock 43 is straightforward with its safety dingus. During testing, I found the trigger pull consistent and the break predictable.
It’s a no-frills, reliable trigger that does its job well, especially for a concealed carry weapon.
M&P Shield
The Shield’s hinge-style trigger is a different beast. Some shooters might find it awkward as it requires specific finger placement.
In my test, I found this trigger style less intuitive, and it affected my shooting experience. It’s something that could be improved with an aftermarket trigger.
Winner
For the trigger mechanism, the Glock 43 takes the win. Its simpler, more straightforward trigger design offers a better and more consistent shooting experience.
The Shield’s hinge-style trigger, while functional, might not suit all shooters and can be a bit finicky in high-stress situations.
4. Slide and Racking
Glock 43
The slide on the Glock 43 is streamlined and efficient, fitting the overall compact design. During my field tests, I found the serrations on the slide adequate but not particularly aggressive.
Racking the slide was smooth, though it could be a bit challenging for those with weaker grip strength. The balance between sleekness and functionality is maintained, but it doesn’t excel in ease of racking.
M&P Shield
The M&P Shield’s slide features more pronounced serrations, giving it an edge in grip and ease of use. In my hands-on experience, the Shield’s slide was noticeably easier to rack compared to the Glock 43.
This is especially beneficial for shooters who might have issues with hand strength or dexterity. The more aggressive design aids in ensuring a firm grip on the slide under various conditions.
Winner
The M&P Shield outperforms the Glock 43 in slide design and ease of racking.
Its more aggressive serrations provide a better grip, making the slide operation smoother and more user-friendly, especially for those who might struggle with a stiffer slide.
5. Aesthetics and Design
Glock 43
The Glock 43 sports a clean, functional design. It’s sleek and minimalistic, which I personally find appealing. During my testing, I appreciated its understated look that doesn’t sacrifice functionality.
It’s a gun that doesn’t need to be flashy to be effective, and its compact design is proportional and well-balanced.
M&P Shield
The M&P Shield has a more distinctive look. It’s slightly more robust in appearance compared to the Glock 43. In my field test, while I found it to be less sleek, it has a certain rugged charm. The design might not be as streamlined, but it does have a character that some shooters might prefer.
Winner
Aesthetics are subjective, but for a sleek, minimalistic design, the Glock 43 takes the lead. It combines functionality with an understated elegance.
However, for those who prefer a more distinct and robust appearance, the M&P Shield would be the better choice.
Pros & Cons of Glock 43
Pros
- Exceptional for concealment, especially in tighter outfits.
- Feels less blocky and more comfortable in hand.
- Texture provides a good balance between grip and comfort.
- Ameriglo sights offer a clear and bright sight picture.
- Slide lock is conveniently positioned for easy access.
Cons
- Slide could be challenging to rack for some.
Pros & Cons of M&P Shield
Pros
- Slightly more substantial grip which aids in recoil control.
- Aggressive slide serrations make it easier to rack.
- Offers an external safety option.
- The Pro Series comes with better visibility sights.
- Generally good aftermarket support.
Cons
- The texture of the Shield 2.0 might be too aggressive for concealed carry.
Similarities Between Glock 43 & M&P Shield
- Both are chambered in 9x19mm caliber.
- Striker-fired systems with no modularity in the frame.
- Marketed towards concealed carry with compact designs.
- Both models have options for magazine extensions.
- Offer a range of aftermarket accessories and customizations.
Differences Between Glock 43 & M&P Shield
- Glock 43 is smaller and lighter, making it better for pocket carry.
- M&P Shield offers a safety option, unlike the Glock 43.
- Shield has more aggressive slide serrations for easier racking.
- Glock 43 has a better factory sight option with Ameriglo sights.
- Shield has a hinge-style trigger, while the Glock 43 has a trigger safety.
- Glock 43 has a slightly better feel and build quality.
- Shield’s grip texture in the 2.0 version might be too aggressive for some.
- Shield is slightly longer and taller than the Glock 43.
- Glock 43 is generally more expensive than the Shield.
Final Verdict
After extensive testing and comparison, I’ve come to a conclusion. Both the Glock 43 and the M&P Shield are exceptional firearms, each excelling in its unique ways.
However, in most of the comparisons, the Glock 43 emerged as my top choice. Its superior concealability, comfortable ergonomics, and reliable trigger mechanism make it an ideal choice for everyday carry.
The Glock 43’s balanced design offers a blend of practicality and performance that suits a wide range of users.
FAQ’s
Is the shield better than the Glock 43?
While the Shield has its strengths, I personally find the Glock 43 to be better. It feels more comfortable to handle, has a more intuitive trigger, and is slightly more compact.
Is M&P Shield better than Glock?
The M&P Shield has its merits, but shooting the Glock 19 is generally easier due to its larger size and better recoil management.
What is comparable to a Glock 43?
The Sig P938 is quite comparable to the Glock 43 in size and functionality. The main differences lie in the Glock 43 being slightly longer and lighter due to its polymer build.
Is Smith & Wesson better than Glock?
This depends on personal preference and the specific models being compared. Each brand has its unique strengths and caters to different user needs.
