As a professional shooter, I’ve had the unique opportunity to test out a wide array of firearms, each with its strengths and quirks.
Two contenders often spark debates among enthusiasts in this arena: the Glock 42 Vs M&P Shield. Both are celebrated for their reliability and design, but which is the winner? Let’s dive in and compare these two based on real field experience.
| Feature | Glock 42 | M&P Shield |
| Caliber | .380 Auto | 9mm |
| Magazine Capacity | 6 rounds | 7 or 9 rounds |
| Weight (w/ empty magazine) | 390 grams (13.76 ounces) | 20.8 ounces |
| Width (Overall) | 0.98 inch | 0.95 inch |
| Height (Including Magazine) | 4.13 inches | 4.6 inches |
Overview of Glock 42
The Glock 42 is renowned for its compactness and ease of handling, making it a top choice for those seeking a reliable yet lightweight firearm.
Specs
- Caliber: .380 Auto
- Magazine Capacity: Standard: 6 rounds
- Barrel Length: 3.25 inches
- Weight (with empty magazine): 390 grams (13.76 ounces)
- Trigger Pull: 24 Newtons
- Length (Overall): 5.94 inches
- Slide Length: 5.75 inches
- Width (Overall): 0.98 inch
- Slide Width: 0.83 inch
- Height (Including Magazine): 4.13 inches
Overview of M&P Shield
The M&P Shield, a micro-compact firearm from Smith & Wesson, is a go-to for those prioritizing a slightly larger caliber in a still compact package.
Specs
- Caliber: 9mm
- Frame Size: Micro-Compact
- Weight: 20.8 ounces
- Width: 0.95 inch
- Height: 4.6 inches
Features Comparison: Glock 42 VS M&P Shield
1. Handling and Recoil Management
Glock 42
The Glock 42 offers exceptional handling due to its smaller frame and lighter weight. During my field tests, I noted its ease of maneuverability, making it a solid choice for quick draw and target acquisition.
The recoil is remarkably soft for a .380 Auto, almost akin to a .22, which is a huge plus for shooters who prioritize comfort and control. This reduced recoil ensures better accuracy and quicker follow-up shots, especially in high-stress scenarios.
M&P Shield
The M&P Shield, with its 9mm caliber, naturally has a bit more kick compared to the Glock 42. However, during my testing, I found that its recoil is still well-managed for its size, thanks to its ergonomic design and slightly heavier frame.
This makes it a viable option for those accustomed to the 9mm recoil and looking for a compact firearm without sacrificing too much on handling and control.
Winner
Regarding handling and recoil management, the Glock 42 stands out compared to the M&P Shield. Its lighter frame and softer recoil make it a more user-friendly option, particularly for those who might be more sensitive to recoil or prefer a gun that’s easier to handle in rapid-fire situations.
The G42’s smooth shooting experience makes it a top pick for those prioritizing comfort and control in a compact firearm.
2. Size and Portability
Glock 42
The Glock 42 impresses with its ultra-compact design. In my hands-on experience, this .380 Auto caliber gun fits snugly in various carrying situations. Its overall length of 5.94 inches and its slim width of 0.98 inches make it incredibly portable.
When I tested it for pocket carry, it was almost unnoticeable, perfect for those who prioritize discretion and ease of carry.
M&P Shield
The M&P Shield, while still compact, is a tad larger compared to the Glock 42. Its height of 4.6 inches and width of 0.95 inches make it slightly bulkier.
During my field test, I found it more noticeable when pocket carried, yet still comfortable for everyday carry. Its micro-compact frame accommodates the larger 9mm rounds, contributing to its slightly increased size.
Winner
For size and portability, the Glock 42 takes the lead compared to the M&P Shield. Its remarkably compact size makes it an ideal choice for those needing a firearm that’s easy to conceal and carry without compromising handling and performance.
3. Weight and Comfort
Glock 42
The Glock 42 stands out with its feather-light weight. At just 390 grams (13.76 ounces) with an empty magazine, it’s remarkably comfortable to carry for extended periods.
Carrying it felt almost effortless during my test, with minimal impact on my movement or comfort, whether in a holster or pocket.
M&P Shield
The M&P Shield, weighing 20.8 ounces, is heavier than the Glock 42 but still falls within a comfortable range for carry.
In my experience, this added weight was noticeable but not burdensome. It offers a solid feel without being too heavy, balancing comfort and the reassurance of a sturdy build.
Winner
Regarding weight and comfort, the Glock 42 edges out compared to the M&P Shield. Its lighter frame makes it an excellent choice for extended carry periods, especially for individuals who prefer a firearm that’s easy on the body during long days.
Pros & Cons of Glock 42
Pros
- Extremely lightweight and compact, it is ideal for concealed carry.
- Reduced recoil makes it user-friendly, especially for shooters with smaller hands.
- Simple design ensures ease of use and reliability.
Cons
- .380 Auto might be less appealing for those preferring more stopping power.
Pros & Cons of M&P Shield
Pros
- Offers more stopping power with its 9mm caliber.
- Higher magazine capacity (7 or 9 rounds) provides an advantage in shooting scenarios.
- Widely available and comes with better warranty options.
Cons
- Slightly heavier and larger than the Glock 42, making it less ideal for pocket carry.
Similarities Between Glock 42 & M&P Shield
- Both are designed for concealed carry with their compact sizes.
- Renowned for their reliability and build quality.
- Feature ergonomic designs that cater to comfortable handling.
- Have reputations for good accuracy within their respective caliber categories.
- Manufactured by well-respected and established firearm companies.
- Offered in configurations that comply with various state regulations.
Differences Between Glock 42 & M&P Shield
- Glock 42 uses .380 Auto caliber while M&P Shield uses 9mm.
- Glock 42 is lighter (13.76 oz) than M&P Shield (20.8 oz).
- Glock 42 has a smaller magazine capacity of 6 rounds, while M&P Shield offers 7 or 9 rounds.
- The M&P Shield is slightly larger in dimensions, affecting its portability compared to the Glock 42.
- Glock 42 has a reputation for softer recoil, in contrast to the more noticeable recoil of the M&P Shield.
Final Verdict
After thoroughly testing and comparing the Glock 42 and the M&P Shield, it’s time to draw a conclusion. Both firearms have their distinct advantages and cater to different preferences and needs.
However, if I had to pick one as the overall winner, it would be the Glock 42. The reason for this choice lies not just in its specifications but in its overall experience.
The Glock 42, with its exceptional ease of handling, lightweight nature, and reduced recoil, stands out as an ideal firearm for a wide range of shooters. Its compactness makes it incredibly versatile for concealed carry without compromising on performance and reliability.
FAQ’s
Is the Glock 42 accurate?
Yes, the Glock 42 is known for its accuracy, especially with its comfortable size that balances well between concealability and shootability.
Is the M&P Shield a good pistol?
Absolutely, the M&P Shield is a reliable and effective pistol, well-suited for concealed carry with its comfortable frame and excellent performance.
Is Smith & Wesson better than Glock?
Comparing Smith & Wesson and Glock is subjective; both are reputable manufacturers. The M&P Shield;s and Glock’s popularity stems from their slim design and reliability, making them an excellent choice for concealed carry.
