Glock 27 Vs M&P Shield

Let’s dive right into a comparison that will grab any firearm enthusiast’s attention: the Glock 27 Vs M&P Shield. 

I’ve had the unique opportunity to test both these guns in the field. My goal? To figure out which one takes the crown. 

I’ll share my hands-on experience with both, focusing on their performance, build, and how they fare in practical scenarios. So, let’s get into the details and see how these two stack up against each other.

Feature	Glock 27	M&P Shield
Caliber	.40 S&W	9mm and .40 S&W
Magazine Capacity	Standard 9	7 rounds (.40 S&W with extended mag)
Barrel Length	3.43 inches	3.1 inches
Weight (Empty Magazine)	21.34 oz	19 ounces
Trigger Pull	Approx. 6.29 lbs	6.5 pounds
Overall Length	6.50 inches	7 inches
Overall Width	1.26 inches	0.95 inches
Height (Including Magazine)	4.17 inches	4.6 inches

Overview of Glock 27

The Glock 27 is a powerhouse in a compact frame, known for its reliability and performance in various conditions. It’s a popular choice for both law enforcement and personal defense.

Specs

• Caliber: .40 S&W
• Magazine Capacity: Standard 9
• Barrel Length: 3.43 inches
• Weight with Empty Magazine: 21.34 oz
• Trigger Pull: Approx. 6.29 lbs (28 N)
• Overall Length: 6.50 inches
• Slide Length: 6.26 inches
• Overall Width: 1.26 inches
• Slide Width: 1.0 inch
• Height Including Magazine: 4.17 inches

Overview of M&P Shield

The M&P Shield by Smith & Wesson is a sleek, concealable firearm that combines ease of use with effective performance. It’s designed for those who prioritize a slim, lightweight gun without compromising power.

Specs

• Caliber: Available in 9mm and .40 S&W
• Barrel Length: 3.1 inches
• Overall Length: 6.1 inches
• Height: 4.6 inches
• Width: 0.95 inches
• Weight (Unloaded): 19 ounces
• Sight Radius: 5.3 inches
• Trigger Pull: 6.5 pounds

Features Comaprison: Glock 27 vs M&P Shield

1. Size and Concealability

Glock 27

The Glock 27 packs a punch in a compact frame. With an overall length of 6.50 inches and a height of 4.17 inches, it’s surprisingly manageable for a .40 caliber. 

The 1.26 inches width is a bit chunky but not overly so. In my tests, it tucked away nicely in an IWB holster, though the width was noticeable under lighter clothing.

M&P Shield

The M&P Shield, on the other hand, is the epitome of slim and concealable. Its 0.95-inch width makes a significant difference in concealment. 

At 7 inches in length and 4.6 inches in height, it’s slightly larger than the Glock 27, but its slim profile makes up for it. Wearing it concealed, it almost disappears, even under a light t-shirt.

Winner

For size and concealability, the M&P Shield takes the lead. Its slender build makes it easier to conceal without sacrificing grip comfort or control.

2. Recoil and Handling

Glock 27

The Glock 27’s recoil is robust, as expected from a .40 caliber. However, it’s surprisingly manageable. The grip size is a bit small for larger hands, but adding a GAP plate makes it more comfortable. 

During rapid-fire tests, it stayed relatively stable, allowing for quick follow-up shots.

M&P Shield

Recoil on the M&P Shield is also quite manageable, even in the .40 S&W version. The grip’s ergonomics, with its 18-degree angle, make it comfortable to hold and shoot. 

The extended magazine offers the added advantage of a better grip, which aids in handling the recoil effectively. In my tests, the Shield remained steady and precise, even during rapid sequences.

Winner

It’s a close call, but the M&P Shield edges out slightly in recoil and handling. The ergonomic grip and the option for an extended magazine provide a slight advantage in control and comfort.

3. Accuracy and Performance

Glock 27

The Glock 27 is a reliable performer. Its accuracy is commendable, with tight groupings at standard defensive ranges. The trigger pull is crisp with a predictable reset, aiding in accuracy. 

During field tests, it performed flawlessly, feeding various ammo types without any issues.

M&P Shield

The Shield shines in this area. Its short, consistent trigger pull and the 5.3-inch sight radius contribute to its accuracy. During my testing, it consistently hit the mark, even at longer ranges than typically expected from a compact. 

The smooth target acquisition and the crisp trigger made rapid firing sessions both fun and precise.

Winner

The M&P Shield wins in the accuracy and performance category. Its design elements, combined with a smooth trigger pull and excellent sight radius, make it a slightly more accurate shooter in varied conditions.

4. Ergonomics and Comfort

Glock 27

The Glock 27, with its standard Glock design, offers a familiar and functional grip. The ergonomics are decent, but for those with larger hands, the grip might feel a bit short. 

I personally found that without a grip extension, my pinky was floating, which can impact stability during rapid fire. Texturing is effective for a secure hold, though it is a bit aggressive for prolonged shooting sessions.

M&P Shield

Smith & Wesson really nailed it with the ergonomics on the Shield. The grip feels more natural in my hand, and the 18-degree grip angle is noticeably more comfortable, especially during extended range time. 

For someone with large hands, the extended magazine really makes a difference, allowing a full grip. The texturing is sufficient for a good grip without being abrasive.

Winner

The M&P Shield wins in ergonomics and comfort. Its design caters to a wider range of hand sizes, and the grip angle makes a noticeable difference in shooting comfort.

5. Build Quality and Durability

Glock 27

Glock’s reputation for durability is well-earned, and the Glock 27 is no exception. The polymer frame is tough, and the overall construction feels solid. 

In my field tests, it handled various environments and conditions without any hiccups. Its finish is resilient against scratches and wear, maintaining its look even after rigorous use.

M&P Shield

The Shield also boasts impressive build quality. The polymer frame feels robust, and the coated stainless steel slide and barrel resist corrosion effectively. 

During my testing, it demonstrated excellent durability, coping well with different types of ammunition and environmental conditions. The finish remained intact, and the internal components showed no signs of premature wear.

Winner

It’s a tie in build quality and durability. Both the Glock 27 and the M&P Shield are built to last, with each showing resilience in demanding conditions. 

Choosing between them on this aspect would boil down to personal preference in brand and aesthetic.

Pros & Cons of Glock 27

Pros

• High Caliber Power: .40 S&W offers potent stopping power.
• Compact Size: Good for concealed carry with a relatively short barrel.
• Solid Build: Durable and reliable, typical of Glock’s reputation.
• Standard Magazine Capacity: Holds 9 rounds, decent for its size.
• Effective Trigger Pull: Firm and consistent, enhancing shot accuracy.

Cons

• Short Grip: Can be uncomfortable for shooters with larger hands.

Pros & Cons of M&P Shield

Pros

• Slim Profile: Excellent for concealed carry, very discreet.
• Ergonomic Grip: Comfortable, especially with extended magazine.
• Lighter Weight: Easier to carry for extended periods.
• Versatile Caliber Options: Available in 9mm and .40 S&W.
• Smooth Trigger Pull: Enhances accuracy with a consistent feel.

Cons

• Lower Standard Capacity: 7 rounds with extended magazine for .40 S&W.

Similarities between Glock 27 & M&P Shield

• Concealable Designs: Both are compact and suitable for concealed carry.
• Polymer Frames: High-strength polymer construction for durability.
• Striker-Fired Action: Both utilize a striker-fired mechanism.
• Available in .40 S&W Caliber: Offered in this high-powered caliber option.
• Corrosion Resistant Finishes: Durable finishes for longevity.

Differences between Glock 27 & M&P Shield

• Magazine Capacity: Glock 27 holds 9 rounds, Shield varies based on the model.
• Width: Glock 27 is wider than the M&P Shield.
• Weight: M&P Shield is lighter than the Glock 27.
• Barrel Length: Glock 27 has a slightly longer barrel.
• Grip Size and Comfort: Shield has a more ergonomic grip.
• Overall Length: M&P Shield is slightly longer than the Glock 27.
• Trigger Pull: Different trigger pull weights and feels.

Final Verdict

After thorough testing and comparison, it’s clear that both the Glock 27 and the M&P Shield have their unique strengths, catering to different preferences and needs. 

While the Glock 27 impresses with its robust build and high-caliber power, the M&P Shield stands out for its slim profile, ergonomic design, and ease of concealment. 

In most of the comparisons, the M&P Shield emerges as a more versatile choice, especially for those who prioritize comfort and concealability without compromising on performance. Its blend of ergonomic design and consistent accuracy makes it my top choice for a daily carry firearm.

FAQs

Is M&P Shield better than Glock?

The M&P Shield and Glock cater to different preferences; the Shield is slimmer and more concealable, while Glocks like the Glock 19 offer better recoil management due to their larger size.

Is there a difference between M&P and M&P Shield?

Yes, there are differences between the M&P and M&P Shield, particularly in grip texture; the M&P 2.0 series has a more aggressive texture compared to the original Shield.

Is M&P Shield a good gun?

How many rounds is a M&P Shield good for?

The 9mm M&P Shield typically has a standard magazine capacity of 7 to 8 rounds, with extended magazines available for higher capacity.