Hey there, fellow shooters! I’m here to share my first-hand experience with two popular .380 ACP pistols: the Beretta Pico Vs Kahr P380.
As a professional shooter, I’ve taken these guns through their paces to determine which one stands out. In this article, I’ll dive into the nitty-gritty of each firearm, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.
Whether you’re in the market for a new concealed carry weapon or just love learning about guns, this comparison will give you the lowdown on what each model has to offer.
| Feature | Beretta Pico | Kahr P380 |
| Caliber | .380 ACP | .380 ACP |
| Capacity | 6+1 | 6+1 |
| Barrel Length | 2.7 inches | 2.53 inches |
| Overall Length | 5.1 inches | 4.9 inches |
| Weight (Unloaded) | 11.5 oz | 9.97 oz |
| Sights | 3-Dot | Drift adjustable, white bar-dot |
| Trigger | Double Action Only (DAO) | Double Action Only (DAO) |
Overview of Beretta Pico
The Beretta Pico is a sleek, ultra-compact pistol designed for maximum concealability and ease of use, making it a top choice for concealed carry enthusiasts.
Specs
- Caliber: .380 ACP
- Capacity: 6+1 rounds
- Barrel Length: 2.7 inches
- Overall Length: 5.1 inches
- Height: 3.94 inches
- Weight: 11.5 oz (unloaded magazine)
- Sights: 3-Dot
Overview of Kahr P380
The Kahr P380 stands out with its exceptional build quality and reliability, tailored for those who prioritize performance and durability in a compact frame.
Specs
- Caliber: .380 ACP
- Capacity: 6+1 rounds
- Overall Length: 4.9 inches
- Barrel Length: 2.53 inches
- Weight: 9.97 oz (unloaded)
- Sights: Drift adjustable, white bar-dot combat sights
Features Comparison of Beretta Pico vs Kahr P380
1. Size and Concealability
Beretta Pico
The Beretta Pico, with its ultra-compact frame, is a standout in terms of size and concealability. Measuring just 5.1 inches in overall length and 3.94 inches in height, it fits almost unnoticed under clothing.
Its slimness, at just 0.725 inches wide, enhances its concealability, making it less likely to print through clothing. This sleek design is a significant advantage for those who prioritize discretion in their concealed carry firearm, ensuring it remains unobtrusive and easily hidden.
Kahr P380
On the other hand, the Kahr P380, though slightly shorter with an overall length of 4.9 inches, shares a similar compactness ideal for concealed carry. Its slightly lighter weight at 9.97 ounces unloaded makes it a comfortable option for all-day carry.
The dimensions are close to the Pico, but its slightly lighter weight can be a deciding factor for those who carry for extended periods. However, the difference in concealability between the two is minimal, as both are designed with a focus on being compact and easy to conceal.
Winner
In the arena of size and concealability, the Beretta Pico slightly edges out the Kahr P380. Its ultra-slim profile and slightly smaller dimensions make it marginally more convenient for concealed carry.
While both guns excel in this aspect, the Pico’s emphasis on a slender build gives it a slight advantage, making it the preferable choice for those seeking the utmost in concealability.
2. Reliability and Performance
Beretta Pico
The Beretta Pico has drawn some concerns over its reliability. The primary issue lies in its stiff DAO trigger, which weighs in at a hefty 12.25 lbs. This heavy pull can be a significant hurdle, especially in high-stress situations where a responsive trigger is crucial.
Kahr P380
The Kahr P380, while facing initial reliability challenges, generally offers a more dependable performance once properly broken in. Some shooters report needing to return it for servicing, but it tends to deliver consistent results post-break-in period.
Its build quality feels more solid, and the action is smoother compared to the Pico. The smoother trigger pull and better overall balance contribute to its reliability, instilling greater confidence in its performance under various shooting conditions.
Winner
Considering reliability and performance, the Beretta Pico takes the lead over the Kahr P380. Although it may require a break-in period, it generally proves to be more reliable in the long term.
3. Sights and Accuracy
Beretta Pico
The Beretta Pico is equipped with 3-Dot sights, which are standard but effective. In my field tests, I found these sights to be quite adequate for close-range shooting.
However, they might not offer the precision desired for more challenging shots or under stressful conditions due to their basic design.
Kahr P380
The Kahr P380 features drift adjustable, white bar-dot combat sights. These sights provided me with a better sight picture compared to the Pico, especially in dynamic shooting scenarios. The added adjustability also allows for more precise zeroing to the shooter’s preference.
Winner
The Kahr P380 wins in the sights and accuracy department. Its white bar-dot combat sights, coupled with adjustability, give it a clear advantage over the Beretta Pico.
Compared to the Pico’s standard 3-Dot setup, the P380’s sights enhance both accuracy and ease of use in various lighting conditions.
Pros & Cons of Beretta Pico
Pros
- Ultra-compact and highly concealable.
- Slim profile for comfortable carry.
- Simple and straightforward operation.
Cons
- Stiff DAO trigger pull.
Pros & Cons of Kahr P380
Pros
- Good balance and ergonomics.
- Smoother trigger compared to Pico.
- Reliable performance once broken in.
Cons
- Initial reliability issues requiring break-in.
Similarities between Beretta Pico & Kahr P380
- Both chambered in .380 ACP.
- Similar magazine capacity (6+1 rounds).
- Compact designs suitable for concealed carry.
- Double-action only triggers.
- Comparable overall lengths (around 5 inches).
- Lightweight and easy to handle.
- Designed for personal defense and concealed carry.
Differences between Beretta Pico & Kahr P380
- Pico is slightly longer and wider than the P380.
- Pico has a stiffer trigger pull (12.25 lbs) compared to the P380.
- Pico feels more plasticky in hand.
- P380 has drift adjustable, white bar-dot combat sights; Pico has 3-Dot sights.
- P380 generally offers better ergonomics.
- P380 requires a break-in period for reliability.
- Pico is slightly heavier (11.5 oz) than the P380 (9.97 oz).
- Pico has a more ultra-compact profile for concealability.
Final Verdict
After thoroughly testing and comparing the Beretta Pico and the Kahr P380, I’ve reached a conclusion that might surprise some.
While both guns have their merits and drawbacks, one has edged out the other in key areas that are crucial for a concealed carry firearm.
The winner, in my opinion, is the Beretta Pico. This decision is not just about the specs or individual features; it’s about the overall shooting experience and reliability, which are paramount for any firearm, especially one that might be used in self-defense situations.
FAQ’s
Did Beretta discontinue the Pico?
Yes, Beretta discontinued the Pico, a semi-automatic pistol known for its compact size and suitability for concealed carry.
What is the difference between Kahr P380 and CW380?
The main differences between the Kahr P380 and CW380 include the barrel type, slide stop lever material, and slide machining, with the P380 having higher-grade features.
Does Kahr P380 have safety?
The Kahr P380 does not have an external safety. It features a long double-action trigger and an internal “safe cam action” that prevents accidental discharge.
Does the Beretta Pico 380 have a safety?
The Beretta Pico 380 does not have a manual safety. It has a double-action only trigger and minimal protrusions on the slide latch and magazine catch for safety.
